2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3124547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attack Detection and Defense System Using an Unknown Input Observer for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 3a, one can find the detection time (t = 58.7 s) under the adaptive threshold is smaller than that (t = 65.9 s) under the precomputed threshold. In contrast to the work in [28], one can find that the developed detection method can reduce attack detection time. In addition, the detection rate analysis method under a certain attack intensity is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed detection method in [29].…”
Section: Performance Of the Proposed Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 3a, one can find the detection time (t = 58.7 s) under the adaptive threshold is smaller than that (t = 65.9 s) under the precomputed threshold. In contrast to the work in [28], one can find that the developed detection method can reduce attack detection time. In addition, the detection rate analysis method under a certain attack intensity is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed detection method in [29].…”
Section: Performance Of the Proposed Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Case 1 is to show the detection performance of the proposed detection method by comparing the work in [28,29]. Case 2 is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed detection and isolation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that the error of state estimation under adaptive unknown input observers is smaller than that under robust state observers. Compared with the UIO-based detection work in Huang and Wang 33 and Yamamoto et al, 34 the performance of state estimation error can be shortened. Furthermore, the false positive rate under the precomputed threshold is used to evaluate the detection performance against FDIA, as shown in Figure 6(b).…”
Section: Guidelines For Manuscript Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above learning-based detection methods relay on the training of historical data. Thus, a physical dynamic model-based detection methods against FDIAs were proposed in Huang and Wang 33 and Yamamoto et al 34 In Huang and Wang, 33 a robust state observer-based detection method against FDIAs was proposed. Yamamoto et al 34 developed an UIO-based detection method against FDIAs in vehicle networking system based on a state residuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%