2016
DOI: 10.15444/gmc2016.03.02.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment Styles and Electronic Word of Mouth (E-Wom) Adoption in Social Networking Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers adopt only information, which they found relevant and useful for them. Therefore, usefulness of information is a significant predictor of the adoption of eWom (Cheung & Thadani, 2012; Daowd et al, 2021; Erkan & Evans, 2018; Lee & Shin, 2014; Park et al, 2019; Sussman & Siegal, 2003). According to Nabi and Hendriks (2003), there is a high probability that consumers will adopt information confidently provided the information is useful for consumers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers adopt only information, which they found relevant and useful for them. Therefore, usefulness of information is a significant predictor of the adoption of eWom (Cheung & Thadani, 2012; Daowd et al, 2021; Erkan & Evans, 2018; Lee & Shin, 2014; Park et al, 2019; Sussman & Siegal, 2003). According to Nabi and Hendriks (2003), there is a high probability that consumers will adopt information confidently provided the information is useful for consumers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, selfmonitoring can be highly relevant to different WOM effects presented in respective types of SNS. Park et al (2019) found a significant role of self-and social surveillance, closely related to self-monitoring, in leading individuals to adopt WOM in SNS. In previous studies, WOM effects were found to be greater amongst high self-monitors in SNS (Jun et al, 2015;Scissor et al, 2016).…”
Section: Self-monitoringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A growing body of literature discloses millennials to be in a “self‐revelatory mode” (Ladson‐Billings, ) and indicates that millennials “build up an implicit knowledge about” how nWOM is construed, including frustration–aggression nuances (Hodder, , p. 707). Many researchers linked millennials' reading of online WOM with self‐relatedness and a “sense of self” conceptualization (Kerviler & Rodriguez, , p. 2), indicating how a discourse of multiple emotional levels within the frustration–aggression continuum arises (Berezan, Krishen, Agarwal, & Kachroo, ; Park, Shin, & Ju, ; Wetzer, Zeelenberg, & Pieters, ). This embraces the presence of the online nWOM initiator as determinant to one's interpretation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%