2011
DOI: 10.1177/0164027511401038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment, Social Network Size, and Patterns of Social Exchange in Later Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when in the presence of a supportive figure, the association between low childhood SES and high physiological reactivity was attenuated. This is important given that insecure attachment orientations are associated with smaller social network sizes and less relationship reciprocity than attachment security (90). Therefore, present study findings may relate to the degree to which individuals experience social support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when in the presence of a supportive figure, the association between low childhood SES and high physiological reactivity was attenuated. This is important given that insecure attachment orientations are associated with smaller social network sizes and less relationship reciprocity than attachment security (90). Therefore, present study findings may relate to the degree to which individuals experience social support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These representations are thought to guide people in establishing close relationships throughout life (Fiori, Consedine, & Merz, 2011;Merz & Consedine, 2009). Research on childhood (e.g., Raikes & Thompson, 2008) and adolescence (e.g., Willemen, Schuengel, & Koot, 2009) clearly supports this supposition but less is known about aspects of close relationships and their origin in adulthood and older age (Merz, Schuengel, & Schulze, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, avoidant individuals tend to have smaller social networks (Fiori, Consedine, & Merz, 2011), suggesting that they might be more likely to live alone or live in smaller households on average. Further, avoidant individuals are less likely to engage in committed relationships, preferring more casual, distant relationships (Schindler, Fagundes, & Murdock, 2010).…”
Section: Geographic Variation In Attachment and Relational Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%