2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment patterns and emotion regulation strategies in the second year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
37
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, infant attachment security at 12 months was expected to predict infants’ use of emotion regulation strategies at 12 and 18 months. In line with attachment theory and previous findings, secure infants were expected to engage in more adaptive strategies than insecure infants; insecure-avoidant infants were expected to engage in less mother-oriented, more object (toy)-oriented, and more self-comforting strategies (Braungart & Stifter, 1991; Crugnola et al, 2011; Diener et al, 2002; Leerkes & Wong, 2012); and insecure-resistant infants were expected to engage in more mother-oriented, avoidance, and tension-reduction strategies (Crugnola et al, 2011; Leerkes & Wong, 2012), compared to secure infants. Third, infant temperamental negative affectivity (at 12 and 18 months) was expected to moderate the relation between maternal bedtime emotional availability and infant emotion regulation strategies at 12 and 18 months.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, infant attachment security at 12 months was expected to predict infants’ use of emotion regulation strategies at 12 and 18 months. In line with attachment theory and previous findings, secure infants were expected to engage in more adaptive strategies than insecure infants; insecure-avoidant infants were expected to engage in less mother-oriented, more object (toy)-oriented, and more self-comforting strategies (Braungart & Stifter, 1991; Crugnola et al, 2011; Diener et al, 2002; Leerkes & Wong, 2012); and insecure-resistant infants were expected to engage in more mother-oriented, avoidance, and tension-reduction strategies (Crugnola et al, 2011; Leerkes & Wong, 2012), compared to secure infants. Third, infant temperamental negative affectivity (at 12 and 18 months) was expected to moderate the relation between maternal bedtime emotional availability and infant emotion regulation strategies at 12 and 18 months.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Insecure-avoidant infants who likely experienced repeated rejection from their parent tend to engage in less parent-oriented, more object-oriented, and more self-comforting emotion regulation strategies (Braungart & Stifter, 1991; Crugnola et al, 2011; Diener et al, 2002; Leerkes & Wong, 2012; Martins, Soares, Martins, Tereno, & Osório, 2012). Insecure-resistant infants are more likely to employ high levels of parent-oriented emotion regulation strategies possibly due to their uncertainty of parental emotional availability based on a history of inconsistent care (Bridges & Grolnick, 1995; Cassidy, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During normal interaction, mother-infant communication appears to be characterized by processes of matching/mismatching/disruption/repair in which the mother and the infant, after failing to share their actions and intentions, effect successful repair, leading to the emergence of new matched states [25,26,27]. These methods of mutual regulation form the basis of future attachment patterns and determine the quality of secure versus insecure attachment [28,29]. They also form the basis of an infant's subsequent ability to regulate emotions, and they have a long-term impact on an infant's socioemotional skills and psychopathological risk [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…self-soothing and distraction) used for emotion regulation purposes in preschool years (Calkins, 2004). Securely attached children demonstrate help-seeking behavior for example by communicating their need for co-regulation of emotion to adults, using more positive strategies and thus protecting the attachment relationship in high-stress situations (Crugnola et al, 2011). This protected relationship provides the child with more diverse strategies for monitoring, evaluating and modifying emotional reactions (Leerkes & Wong, 2012), making them capable of "guided self-regulation" (Sroufe et al, 2005, p. 107).…”
Section: Mechanisms Mediating Between Parental Attachment and Academimentioning
confidence: 99%