2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli to stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results strongly indicate that the hydrophobicity of the isolates influenced the attachment of the bacteria rather than their ability to form biofilm once attached. A positive correlation between the hydrophobic properties of E. coli isolates and their attachment abilities has been reported in some studies (37)(38)(39)(40), whereas others have failed to find such a relationship (41)(42)(43). It has been suggested that the differences between these studies could be explained, e.g., by the number and variety of strains included in the study and/or a lack of sensitivity within methods (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results strongly indicate that the hydrophobicity of the isolates influenced the attachment of the bacteria rather than their ability to form biofilm once attached. A positive correlation between the hydrophobic properties of E. coli isolates and their attachment abilities has been reported in some studies (37)(38)(39)(40), whereas others have failed to find such a relationship (41)(42)(43). It has been suggested that the differences between these studies could be explained, e.g., by the number and variety of strains included in the study and/or a lack of sensitivity within methods (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other studies have found no such relationship (16,18), while further studies have suggested that individual strains may behave in unique manners with respect to how these properties affect their attachment (6,9). The contrasting results in the literature may be due to the number of strains and species included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The first step in the contamination of a surface is the attachment of cells to the substrate (10). E. coli O157:H7 has been shown to attach to a variety of substrates, including stainless steel (SS) (16,18), glass and Teflon (9), fresh produce (2), beef muscle and adipose tissue (15), and cultured intestinal cell lines (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment data from this study were compared with previously reported physiochemical and attachment data from the same isolates. No correlation was observed between the results of this study and hydrophobicity results obtained using hydrophobic interaction chromatography (R 2 ϭ 0.0004 to 0.0089), contact angle measurement (R 2 ϭ 0.0158 to 0.0347), bacterial attachment to hydrocarbons (for hexadecane, R 2 ϭ 0.0055 to 0.0839; for xylene, R 2 ϭ 0.0021 to 0.0769), or previously described stainless steel attachment results (R 2 ϭ 0.000006 to 0.1630) (3,18,19;Chia et al,submitted). It should be noted in these previous studies no direct correlation was observed between attachment of E. coli to stainless steel and cell surface hydrophobicity (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…No correlation was observed between the results of this study and hydrophobicity results obtained using hydrophobic interaction chromatography (R 2 ϭ 0.0004 to 0.0089), contact angle measurement (R 2 ϭ 0.0158 to 0.0347), bacterial attachment to hydrocarbons (for hexadecane, R 2 ϭ 0.0055 to 0.0839; for xylene, R 2 ϭ 0.0021 to 0.0769), or previously described stainless steel attachment results (R 2 ϭ 0.000006 to 0.1630) (3,18,19;Chia et al,submitted). It should be noted in these previous studies no direct correlation was observed between attachment of E. coli to stainless steel and cell surface hydrophobicity (18). While at a strain level, hydrophobicity did not appear to influence bacterial adhesion capacity, when analyzed at a species level, the mean values for hydrophobicity measurements (using bacterial attachment to hydrocarbons for hexadecane and hydrophobic interaction chromatograpy) showed E. coli to be significantly more hydrophobic than Salmonella (P Յ 0.05), which may be linked to the greater attachment of the former species to the cell lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%