1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199810)42:1<117::aid-jbm15>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment, morphology, and protein expression of rat marrow stromal cells cultured on charged substrate surfaces

Abstract: Although surface charge has been shown to affect the adhesion and morphology of a variety of cell types, the interactions of bone marrow stromal cells with charged surfaces still remain unclear. A novel electrical stimulation system was used to investigate the interactions between rat bone marrow stromal cells and charged substrates in this study. A conductive and transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) coating was used as an electret substrate. Rat marrow stromal cells were cultured on positive, negative, and unch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the interaction of biological molecules, especially proteins, with biomaterials has been studied extensively. Much work has been done to investigate the influence of surface properties, such as charge and hydrophobicity, on the adsorption of proteins and subsequently, the responses of cells [8,19,20,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, the results have been confusing (for a recent review, see Chapter 12 of [34]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the interaction of biological molecules, especially proteins, with biomaterials has been studied extensively. Much work has been done to investigate the influence of surface properties, such as charge and hydrophobicity, on the adsorption of proteins and subsequently, the responses of cells [8,19,20,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. However, the results have been confusing (for a recent review, see Chapter 12 of [34]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At physiological conditions, pH=7.4, anionic gels are negatively charged and the electrostatic repulsion among charges on the polymer chain result in significant swelling [2,14]. Anionic hydrogels in highly swollen state should be able to trap a large amount of proteins and other bioactive molecules in biological fluids, either by protein entanglement in the surface or electrostatic interactions [18][19][20]. We speculated that this phenomenon, if it occurs, might provide essential molecular interaction sites for gels to support cellular activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of surface charges and its influence on cell attachment and function has been emphasized by other workers. 29 From this perspective, the observation that a Ti surface grafted with peptide exhibited a limited decrease in hydrophobicity supports the hypothesis that chemical modification minimally influences cell attachment and function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11] A number of studies have focused on how cell adhesion and shape are affected by chemically charged substrates with corresponding functional chemical groups such as -COOH (negatively charged at pH 7.4) and -NH 2 (positively charged at pH 7.4). 9,[12][13][14][15] Few studies have investigated the effects of electric charge 12 or charged nanoparticles 13,14 on cell adhesion and shape. It is widely accepted that negative and positive charges influence cell behavior, however, it remains unclear whether cell adhesion and shape are affected by charge alone 8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] because it is difficult to separate charge effects on cell adhesion and shape.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%