2014
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment Models in Incarcerated Sex Offenders: A Preliminary Italian Study Using the Adult Attachment Interview

Abstract: A group of sex offenders (clinical group: n = 19) was compared to a nonclinical sample matched by age, years of education, and gender (control group A: n = 19) to verify a higher incidence of insecure attachment models among sex offenders. In addition, we tested whether sex offenders were characterized by specific childhood experiences, compared to control adults (control group B: n = 19) with the same secure/insecure attachment classification. Results showed significant differences between offenders and contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A preoccupied SoM is mostly described as the typical attachment pattern underlying stalkers' behaviors and motivation, but the great majority of these studies refer to general or student populations, whereas our study focused on detained subjects with specific emotional mechanisms, features, and needs. In fact, our results confirm the findings of Levinson and Fonagy (2004), who asserted that prisoners, especially psychiatric ones, are mainly labeled Ds in their attachment patterns; our findings are also in agreement with the results of Grattagliano et al (2015), even if their sample of sex offenders was not entirely comparable with our stalking sample. Another explanation of this finding may be found because very few studies have administered the AAI to a sample of people selected for having committed stalking crimes, whereas other self-report instruments have assessed actual adult relationships, so the results are not clearly and linearly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A preoccupied SoM is mostly described as the typical attachment pattern underlying stalkers' behaviors and motivation, but the great majority of these studies refer to general or student populations, whereas our study focused on detained subjects with specific emotional mechanisms, features, and needs. In fact, our results confirm the findings of Levinson and Fonagy (2004), who asserted that prisoners, especially psychiatric ones, are mainly labeled Ds in their attachment patterns; our findings are also in agreement with the results of Grattagliano et al (2015), even if their sample of sex offenders was not entirely comparable with our stalking sample. Another explanation of this finding may be found because very few studies have administered the AAI to a sample of people selected for having committed stalking crimes, whereas other self-report instruments have assessed actual adult relationships, so the results are not clearly and linearly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Different from other studies, where emerges that stalkers use hyper-activating emotional strategies (e.g., Davis et al, 2000; Spitzberg & Cupach, 2014), our sample of detained stalkers seems to be more comparable to the results of Veglia and Castellino (2013), Grattagliano et al (2015) and Fonagy and Levinson (2004) who asserted that sex offenders and prisoners use mainly de-activating and derogating strategies when they have to deal with self and others’ emotions, but this attitude is associate with a deep behavioral dys-regulation. Assuming this framework, the emotional deprivation theory suggested by Fonagy and Levinson (2004) provides a fertile perspective in which it is possible to understand stalkers’ dysfunctional psychological functioning.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The common hypothesis is that people who did not experience security in their first attachment relationships may tend to have problems with emotional regulation (Babcock et al, 2000; Cassidy, 1994; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2019). The vast majority of studies have concluded that stalkers probably present ambivalent, avoidant or, more generally, insecure attachment states of mind with respect to adult attachment (Civilotti et al, 2020; Davis et al, 2000; Grattagliano et al, 2015). Furthermore, according to Lewis et al (2001), stalkers tend to have difficulties with forming and maintaining appropriate and reciprocal relationships and with emotional stability.…”
Section: Dissociation In Stalker Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dismissing people have a positive view of self and a negative view of others, and they are rejecting other people to maintain their high sense of self ( Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991 ; Feeney & Noller, 1990 ). Literature has broadly underlined that insecurely attached people are susceptible to experiencing negative emotions due to the rejecting or inconstant responses offered by their caregivers ( Grattagliano et al, 2015 ; Troyer & Greitemeyer, 2018 ). Moreover, they might show more self-centred emotional reactions and difficulties in considering the real emotions and needs of others ( van der Mark, van Ijzendoorn, & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2002 ).…”
Section: The Role Of Attachment Stylementioning
confidence: 99%