2015
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment, emotion regulation, and adaptation to breast cancer: assessment of a mediational hypothesis

Abstract: This study highlights the importance of addressing emotional regulation jointly with attachment to deepen the comprehension of the relational processes implicated in adaptation to breast cancer. Results supported a mediational hypothesis, presenting emotional regulation processes as relevant dimensions for the understanding of attachment associations with adaptation to breast cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
32
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of breast cancer, both emotion suppression and lack of emotional awareness have generally been associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes, such as poorer quality of life, more pain and higher levels of psychological distress (e.g., Ávila et al, 2015;Baudic et al, 2016;Iwamitsu et al, 2005;Li et al, 2015;Mantani et al, 2007;Marrazzo et al, 2016;Schlatter & Cameron, 2010;Sousa, Guerra, & Lencastre, 2015;). One explanation for the negative effects of emotion suppression or control is suppression takes place late in the emotion generative and regulatory process.…”
Section: Emotion Regulation and Adaptation To Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the context of breast cancer, both emotion suppression and lack of emotional awareness have generally been associated with poorer psychosocial outcomes, such as poorer quality of life, more pain and higher levels of psychological distress (e.g., Ávila et al, 2015;Baudic et al, 2016;Iwamitsu et al, 2005;Li et al, 2015;Mantani et al, 2007;Marrazzo et al, 2016;Schlatter & Cameron, 2010;Sousa, Guerra, & Lencastre, 2015;). One explanation for the negative effects of emotion suppression or control is suppression takes place late in the emotion generative and regulatory process.…”
Section: Emotion Regulation and Adaptation To Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific reasons why attachment might facilitate or hinder adaptation to cancer, however, are less explored. Attachment is one factor that may shape this coping response (Ávila, Brandão, Teixeira, Coimbra, & Matos, 2015;Cabral, Matos, Beyers, & Soonens, 2012;Waldinger & Schulz, 2016). It is now clear that successful adaptation to breast cancer depends, in part, on patients' abilities to cope with the strong and complex emotions that are likely to arise (see Brandão, Tavares, Schulz, & Matos, 2016; for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EPERIC subscale on Fear of rejection showed strong correlations with the three dependent variables, and also predicted negative affect. The secure attachment style (usually measured in terms of low scores on the avoidance and anxiety dimensions of attachment, which would correspond to low scores on Fear of rejection and abandonment), has been related to a better emotional state during illness (Ávila et al, 2015;Fagundes et al, 2014;Lo et al, 2010). Strong fear of rejection assumes hyper-activation of the mechanisms detecting such a threat, and this pattern is probably generalized into a more sensitive perception of other types of threat as well, such as the illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have explored this relationship, and the secure attachment style has been related to better adjustment in managing the illness (Cicero, Lo Coco, Gullo, & Lo Verso, 2009;Lo et al, 2010;Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Very recently, relationships have been found between secure attachment and emotional well-being, particularly with the dimension of fear of rejection and abandonment (Alonso, Fontanil, & Ezama, 2016;Ávila, Brandão, Teixeira, Coimbra, & Matos, 2015;Fagundes, Jaremka, Malarkey, & KiecoltGlaser, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%