2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrioventricular block in patients undergoing treatment with bradycardic drugs. Predictors of pacemaker requirement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although common clinical practice supports such an observation this is the first time such data is presented, as former studies lacked dosage characterization. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Nonetheless, even in the cohort with the highest dosage and Interestingly, we were able to obtain prior ECG data for most of the population, which was not available in previous reports. It demonstrated an overall very high burden of conduction abnormalities, and this was consistent even for the cohort with initial recovery of rhythm and late recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although common clinical practice supports such an observation this is the first time such data is presented, as former studies lacked dosage characterization. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Nonetheless, even in the cohort with the highest dosage and Interestingly, we were able to obtain prior ECG data for most of the population, which was not available in previous reports. It demonstrated an overall very high burden of conduction abnormalities, and this was consistent even for the cohort with initial recovery of rhythm and late recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, such bradyarrhythmia can be associated with extrinsic causes, most notably myocardial infarction (MI), AV nodal blocking drugs (such as beta-blockers and some calcium channel blockers) and metabolic disorders such as hyperkaliemia, some of which are potentially reversible. 3 In about 20%−50% of "iatrogenic" AVB there is recovery of rhythm with suspension and correction of secondary causes [4][5][6][7] and, in such cases, a permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is not recommended. 1,2 Nevertheless, in short follow-up studies only about 10%−15% of patients are able to maintain a sustained recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion follows the observation that most AV blocks cannot be attributed to medication alone, with drugs being a mere trigger of an underlying condition. In addition, delay in PM implantation may result in adverse effects on both the patient's quality of life and long-term prognosis as well as the financial burden on the healthcare system resulting from repeated and prolonged hospitalizations [1,18]. Considering these effects, a paradigm shift appears to be necessary, and there are already recommendations for the implantation of a PM despite bradycardic treatment, under certain conditions [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the inducing agent is appropriately discontinued, this is not the case for almost half of the patients due to the persistence or recurrence of high-grade AVB (ref. 6,7 ). It is not clear whether DR-AVB reversal will be achieved in a given patient and how long to wait before deciding permanent pacemaker implanta-tion 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%