2017
DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrioesophageal Fistula After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A single center series

Abstract: Chest pain and fever were the early symptoms of AEF and occurred before the neurologic complications. Chest CT was an excellent tool for detection of AEF. All patients who were diagnosed correctly and underwent surgery survived. Early detection is imperative as prompt surgery may improve survival. Health-care community education is the key to ensure early detection and transfer to a qualified surgical center.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AEFs are a rare and potentially serious complication of AF catheter ablation with a reported incidence of 0.015 to 0.04%, with the rate thought to be underreported due to low response rates on surveys and misdiagnosis. 53 AEF is the second highest cause of mortality associated with procedural complications, with the mortality rate of 40 to 100% thought to be due to a delay in diagnosing the condition and the complicated surgical procedure required to treat the condition. 53 Even when the condition is identified, patients have a high risk of mortality.…”
Section: Atrioesophageal Fistula Following Catheter Ablation and Its mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AEFs are a rare and potentially serious complication of AF catheter ablation with a reported incidence of 0.015 to 0.04%, with the rate thought to be underreported due to low response rates on surveys and misdiagnosis. 53 AEF is the second highest cause of mortality associated with procedural complications, with the mortality rate of 40 to 100% thought to be due to a delay in diagnosing the condition and the complicated surgical procedure required to treat the condition. 53 Even when the condition is identified, patients have a high risk of mortality.…”
Section: Atrioesophageal Fistula Following Catheter Ablation and Its mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 AEF is the second highest cause of mortality associated with procedural complications, with the mortality rate of 40 to 100% thought to be due to a delay in diagnosing the condition and the complicated surgical procedure required to treat the condition. 53 Even when the condition is identified, patients have a high risk of mortality. 54 Interestingly, while mucosal changes such as ulcers and erythema can be visualized on esophagogastroduodenoscopy in many cases, in 27% of patients, structural mediastinal changes were only found on endosonography.…”
Section: Atrioesophageal Fistula Following Catheter Ablation and Its mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left atrial ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly utilized for the treatment of atrial fibrillation 1 . The attainment of PVI can be achieved with radiofrequency (RF) energy to burn atrial tissue or with direct application of cryothermal energy; however, collateral damage to surrounding structures remains a risk with either method, with esophageal injury being one of the most serious 2,3,4 . The most extreme esophageal injury, atrioesophageal fistula (AEF), remains challenging to prevent and diagnose, and carries a very high mortality 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal damage to the esophagus is a risk from radiofrequency (RF) ablation or cryoablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) [1][2][3]. The most extreme type of thermal injury is an atrioesophageal fistula (AEF), with a mortality rate of 80% or more [4][5][6][7][8]. Various strategies for protecting the esophagus during RF ablation or reducing the severity of injury have been developed, including power reduction, avoidance of greater contact force, temperature monitoring, esophageal deviation, and esophageal cooling, with varying degrees of success [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%