Atributos de la organización que aprende: una revisión de la literatura

Zapata, Esteban; Muiña, Fernando Enrique García; Moreno, Susana María García

doi:10.17345/rio16.59-81

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some firms' strategy is focused on specializing more in one type of learning over the other, but organizational ambidexterity is the ability of some organizations to simultaneously develop exploration and exploitation learning and in a balanced way (Gibson and Birkinshaw, 2004; Gupta et al , 2006; Raisch and Birkinshaw, 2008; Simsek, 2009; López-Zapata et al , 2012). Ambidextrous firms can exploit existing competences as well as explore new opportunities with equal dexterity (Lubatkin et al , 2006).…”

Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms

Zapata

Ramírez-Gómez

2021

JIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study analyzes the impact of intellectual capital on organizational ambidexterity by evaluating the mediating effect of the different types of organizational cultures (adhocracy, clan, market and hierarchy) on the said relationship.Design/methodology/approachFrom a sample of 124 directors of Colombian firms, the information is analyzed using Structural Equation Models through the Partial Least Squares method (SEM-PLS).FindingsThe results show that intellectual capital has a positive relationship with organizational ambidexterity and that market culture presents a positive mediating effect in the said relationship, while the mediating effects of adhocracy culture, clan culture and hierarchy culture are not significant.Practical implicationsDirectors can favor the development of organizational ambidexterity by investing in the intellectual capital of their firms and by promoting the development of market culture attributes.Originality/valueThis work contributes empirical evidence on the mediating role of organizational culture in the relationship between intellectual capital and ambidexterity, highlighting the importance of market culture over other types of culture for the simultaneous development of exploration and exploitation capabilities, in the context of an emerging Latin American economy such as Colombia.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The three types of intellectual capital are important for innovation (Agostini and Nosella, 2017; Allameh, 2018) and for firm performance (Pedro et al , 2018; Ahmed et al , 2019). For this reason, organizational learning is a critical dynamic capability for competitiveness (López-Zapata et al , 2018).…”

Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms

Zapata

Ramírez-Gómez

2021

JIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A diferencia de las organizaciones primitivas o tradicionales, según López-Zapata, García-Muiña y García-Moreno (2016), la organización moderna da un alto valor a la racionalidad, efectividad y eficiencia, combinando los recursos y capacidades en busca de agregar valor a los actores involucrados dentro del proceso empresarial. Es así como la concepción de este nuevo tipo de organizaciones se fundamenta en el aprendizaje y la tecnología, ambos componentes favorecen la iniciativa, creatividad así como la innovación requerida para contextos dinámicos.…”

Section: Organizaciones Modernasunclassified

Formas organizativas modernas en empresas grandes del sector cooperativo colombiano/ Modern organizational forms in large companies of the Colombian cooperative sector

2020

RCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen Las organizaciones en general, y las cooperativas en particular, han sido objeto de cambios progresivos producto del sistema globalizado y de mercados diferenciados, que las han obligado a adoptar nuevos modelos organizacionales fundamentados en las premisas de añadir flexibilidad y valor para ser más competitivas, productivas e innovadoras. En ese contexto, el objetivo del artículo es determinar las formas organizativas modernas que presentan empresas grandes del sector cooperativo multiactivo colombiano, considerando sus estructuras, conductas y procedimientos. El enfoque fue cuantitativo, con un alcance descriptivo, transversal. Se utilizó la técnica de encuesta aplicada a 126 empleados en una población de 28 cooperativas seleccionadas intencionalmente. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría de los encuestados considera que las cooperativas multiactivas analizadas presentan formas estructurales, comportamentales y procedimentales modernas, basadas en la existencia de estructuras flexibles y el comportamiento dinámico de su personal. Se concluye que las empresas grandes del sector cooperativo estudiadas no aplican un solo tipo de formas organizativas, sino que toman la que mejor se adapten a las necesidades propias del sector, para convertirse en referentes de organizaciones que hacen posible la aplicación del nuevo paradigma imperante en la sociedad. Abstract Organizations in general, and particularly cooperatives, have been subject to progressive changes as a result of the globalized system and different markets, which have forced them to adopt new organizational models based on the premises of adding flexibility and value to be more competitive, productive, and innovative. In this context, the objective of the article is to determine the modern organizational forms that large companies of the Colombian multi-asset cooperative sector have, considering their structures, behaviors and procedures. The approach was quantitative, with a descriptive, transversal scope. The technique used in this article is a survey applied to 126 employees in a population of 28 intentionally selected cooperatives. The results show that the majority of respondents consider that the multi-asset cooperatives analyzed show modern structural, behavioral and procedural forms, based on the existence of flexible structures and the dynamic behavior of their staff. It is concluded that the large companies in the cooperative sector studied do not apply a single type of organizational form, but take the one that best suits the sector's own needs, to become benchmarks for organizations that make possible the application of the new prevailing paradigm in the society.

show abstract

“…Trabajos recientes que abordan la problemática en el contexto latinoamericano enfatizan el necesario carácter situado, práctico, agencial e interaccional del conocimiento y del aprendizaje, y señalan de distintas maneras una diversidad de aspectos participantes (Castañeda Zapata, 2015;López Zapata, García Muiña & García Moreno, 2016).…”

unclassified

Dimensiones del pensamiento sistémico aplicado: un estudio de casos múltiple desde la perspectiva de sistemas complejos y el aprendizaje organizacional

Montenegro

Schroeder

2020

Psicol. Conoc. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Atributos de la organización que aprende: una revisión de la literatura

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms

Intellectual capital, organizational culture and ambidexterity in Colombian firms

Formas organizativas modernas en empresas grandes del sector cooperativo colombiano/ Modern organizational forms in large companies of the Colombian cooperative sector

Dimensiones del pensamiento sistémico aplicado: un estudio de casos múltiple desde la perspectiva de sistemas complejos y el aprendizaje organizacional

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About