“…In fact, the reviewed literature shows a mixed causal classification for some items and a certain shared content between cultural attributions and internal or external attributions. This suggests that it could be more useful to consider them as complementary or coexistent instead of mutually exclusive categories or contradictory beliefs (Hunt 1996;Cozzarelli et al 2001;Bullock and Waugh 2005;Bobbio et al 2010;Weiner et al 2011;Small et al 2010;Norcia et al 2010;Sainz et al 2022;Segretin et al 2022). In this way, and according to previous studies, this study confirmed (1) three factors for poverty attributions: internal (items 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11), external-structural (items 3, 7, 8, 12, 22) and cultural (items 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21) in line with most of the results from different research studies (Cozzarelli et al 2001;Reyna and Reparaz 2014;Segretin et al 2022); (2) significant differences between the three factors but also moderately significant relationships between the cultural factor and internal or external-structural factors (Halik et al 2012;Reyna and Reparaz 2014;Sainz et al 2022); and (3) a stronger alpha coefficient for internal and external attributions for poverty versus the third factor (which, in this study, is cultural, whereas it is fatalistic/structural in other studies) (Cozzarelli et al 2001;Bullock et al 2003;Ljubotina and Ljubotina 2007;Halik et al 2012;Bastias et al 2019;Sainz et al 2022).…”