2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial Tachycardia After Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: Approximately 90% of ATs after CPVA are re-entrant, and nearly all are related to gaps in prior ablation lines. These findings suggest that the prevalence of these arrhythmias may be reduced by limiting the number of linear lesions, demonstration of linear block, and pulmonary vein disconnection during the initial AF procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
91
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of additional lines in cases of persistent AF remains controversial. 508 The recently completed STAR-AF study of ablation strategies for persistent AF showed no improvement in ablation efficacy for linear lesions plus PVI vs PVI alone. 245 The Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CHASE-AF) study also revealed that the addition of linear lesions and defragmentation of PVI did not improve outcomes for ablation of persistent AF compared with PVI alone.…”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The role of additional lines in cases of persistent AF remains controversial. 508 The recently completed STAR-AF study of ablation strategies for persistent AF showed no improvement in ablation efficacy for linear lesions plus PVI vs PVI alone. 245 The Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CHASE-AF) study also revealed that the addition of linear lesions and defragmentation of PVI did not improve outcomes for ablation of persistent AF compared with PVI alone.…”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The role of posterior wall isolation in cases of persistent AF also remains controversial. 508 For patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF, 22% of the writing group members perform posterior wall isolation at the time of an initial AF ablation procedure and 38% of the writing group members perform posterior wall isolation for repeat AF ablation procedures in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Based on this information and a review of the literature, the writing group recommends that posterior wall isolation might be considered during an initial or repeat AF ablation for paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing persistent AF (Class IIb, LOE C-LD, Table 3).…”
Section: Section 5: Strategies Techniques and Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations