2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(07)60047-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atrial Flutter: an Update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to radiofrequency ablation, which can be very painful in this region. 3,10 In our study, the long-term results were comparable to those obtained after radiofrequency ablation reporting up to 15% of AFL recurrences after assessment of acute bidirectional isthmus conduction block. 4 -6,11 Resumption of AFL occurred mostly in the first months after radiofrequency ablation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is in contrast to radiofrequency ablation, which can be very painful in this region. 3,10 In our study, the long-term results were comparable to those obtained after radiofrequency ablation reporting up to 15% of AFL recurrences after assessment of acute bidirectional isthmus conduction block. 4 -6,11 Resumption of AFL occurred mostly in the first months after radiofrequency ablation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One possible speculation is that resolution of AF by ablation involves different anatomical targets (i.e., pulmonary veins, highly fractionated areas, ganglionated plexi, etc. ), while AFL has a unique target area, the cavotricuspid isthmus [18,19]. Persistence of the modulator (SA) after AF ablation may predispose new triggers to regenerate AF, while in patients with AFL, this may be prevented by a bidirectional block at the isthmus level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate is slightly higher than what has been previously reported. Traditionally, recurrence rates of AFL after catheter ablation have been <10% [18]. However, this value has more recently been refined with bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block as the endpoint (3-5%) [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the progress made in catheter technology such as 8-mm and irrigated-tip catheters, and the use of more stringent electrophysiological endpoints such as bidirectional isthmus block, radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter has become a routine procedure with high success of 90-95%. It is also a quick procedure with very low complication rates [3]. Whilst catheter ablation carries a class I indication in the most recent international guidelines for long-term management of patients with either recurrent, drug-refractory or poorly tolerated atrial flutter, it is not indicated in the management of acute atrial flutter [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst direct current cardioversion is extremely effective in terminating acute atrial flutter, it is not curative and the existing treatment paradigm for recurrent atrial flutter, particularly when associated with haemodynamic compromise, is less than ideal. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter is a potentially curative technique with short procedural times, high success and very low complication rates in elective cases, but its application to intensive care patients is not well defined [2,3]. We describe a patient with poorly tolerated atrial flutter for which various treatment strategies were not only ineffective but resulted in clinical deterioration before the flutter was successfully treated by radiofrequency ablation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%