Abstract:Investigating the effects of soil properties on herbicide persistence can aid in evaluating the carryover potential of herbicides in soil and the consequent injury risk to rotational crops. Laboratory incubation experiments were conducted to quantify the persistence of atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone in five regional soils under aerobic conditions at 23 ˚C. Additionally, mesosulfuron-methyl persistence was tested at 7 ˚C, which is representative of regional average winter soil temperature. Herbi… Show more
“…In the selected soil types, estimated mesosulfuron‐methyl concentrations for 30%, 50%, or 80% visual injury or aboveground dry biomass reduction in soybean and canola at all evaluation timings always exceeded the predicted average carryover concentration of 0.06 g ai ha −1 (Table 5). This concentration was calculated from linear regression equations describing mesosulfuron‐methyl persistence in the selected soil types in a previous study (Ramanathan et al., 2022). However, Grey and McCullough (2012) found that carryover residue from chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron‐methyl when applied in combination at rates of 88.0 and 18.0 g ai ha −1 , respectively, caused significant height reduction in soybean, and height and yield reduction in cotton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this research was to evaluate herbicide carryover injury risk in varying soils based on differences in herbicide bioavailability. Of the regional soils in which atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone persistence were quantified in previous research by Ramanathan et al (2022), Candor sand, Creedmoor sandy loam, and Portsmouth sandy loam were selected as soils of interest for the present study owing to the range in herbicide half-life among these soil types and their varying textural and physicochemical properties. Bioassays are powerful tools by which measurements of such plant responses to herbicides can be used to evaluate soil-herbicide-plant relationships (Jeffries & Gannon, 2016;Loux, 1990;Sandín-España et al, 2011;Strebig & Kudsk, 1993).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select herbicide treatment concentrations, the average herbicide carryover concentration at the time of soybean planting was first calculated using linear regression equations describing the first-order rate of degradation of atrazine, mesosulfuronmethyl, and topramezone in the same soil types established in a previous study (Ramanathan et al, 2022). The equations described in Ramanathan et al (2022) relate the initial concentration of each herbicide to the concentration remaining after degradation over time at a specific degradation rate unique to each soil type. Therefore, respective equations for atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone degradation in Candor sand, Creedmoor sandy loam, and Portsmouth sandy loam were used to calculate the average carryover concentration remaining at the time of soybean planting across soils, assuming the initial herbicide concentration to be the maximum application rate applied to previous season corn (atrazine and topramezone) or winter wheat (mesosulfuron-methyl) and estimating 335, 90, and 212 days between atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone application, and soybean planting in the region, respectively (USDA-NASS, 2022).…”
Section: Herbicide Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported field half‐life range for topramezone is between 11 and 69 days (Lewis et al., 2016; Shaner, 2014c). Previous research shows that atrazine half‐life ranged from 37 to 73 days and topramezone half‐life ranged from 15 to 19 days in regionally relevant NC soil types, and their persistence was found to be dependent on soil OM content, clay content, and pH, while mesosulfuron‐methyl persistence was also influenced by soil temperature (Ramanathan et al., 2022). Collectively, half‐life ranges of these herbicides suggest that they can persist in soil and become available for uptake by rotational crops long after their application, depending on edaphic factors and environmental conditions (Frank, 1966; Rahman et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Quantification of atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone persistence in regional soil types allows the estimation of average carryover residue concentration that may be present at the time of soybean planting in NC (Ramanathan et al., 2022). Characterizing the bioavailability of atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone will provide needed insight regarding differences among representative regional soils in their potential for carryover herbicide injury depending on the influence of their properties on the availability of carryover herbicide concentration for plant uptake.…”
Herbicide carryover injury to rotational crops can vary in severity depending on the influence of soil properties on herbicide bioavailability. Greenhouse bioassays were conducted with soybean, radish, and canola to evaluate differences in the bioavailability of three herbicides with carryover risk, atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone. Bioassays were conducted in three varying regional soil types with nine herbicide treatment rates including a control. Plant visual injury was evaluated weekly, and aboveground dry biomass was weighed after harvest of soybean 28 days after emergence (DAE) and radish and canola 21 DAE. A log‐logistic dose–response regression model was used to quantify herbicide‐effective concentrations for 30% (EC30), 50% (EC50), and 80% (EC80) visual injury and aboveground dry biomass reduction in each soil type. Relative herbicide‐soil bioavailability was determined through comparisons of herbicide‐effective concentrations among soil types. Pearson correlation revealed that atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone EC30 for all species were positively correlated to soil organic matter (OM) content (r = 0.56, 0.48, and 0.40, respectively) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (r = 0.43, 0.41, and 0.45). Topramezone EC80 for soybean and radish was positively correlated to soil clay content (r = 0.51) and silt content (r = 0.51) and negatively correlated to sand content (r = −0.51) and pH (r = −0.52). Decreased atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone bioavailability in soil with high OM and CEC, decreased topramezone bioavailability in coarse‐textured soil and at high soil pH, and differential herbicide sensitivity of crop species can inform grower decisions on herbicide selections and rotational crop plans.
“…In the selected soil types, estimated mesosulfuron‐methyl concentrations for 30%, 50%, or 80% visual injury or aboveground dry biomass reduction in soybean and canola at all evaluation timings always exceeded the predicted average carryover concentration of 0.06 g ai ha −1 (Table 5). This concentration was calculated from linear regression equations describing mesosulfuron‐methyl persistence in the selected soil types in a previous study (Ramanathan et al., 2022). However, Grey and McCullough (2012) found that carryover residue from chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron‐methyl when applied in combination at rates of 88.0 and 18.0 g ai ha −1 , respectively, caused significant height reduction in soybean, and height and yield reduction in cotton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this research was to evaluate herbicide carryover injury risk in varying soils based on differences in herbicide bioavailability. Of the regional soils in which atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone persistence were quantified in previous research by Ramanathan et al (2022), Candor sand, Creedmoor sandy loam, and Portsmouth sandy loam were selected as soils of interest for the present study owing to the range in herbicide half-life among these soil types and their varying textural and physicochemical properties. Bioassays are powerful tools by which measurements of such plant responses to herbicides can be used to evaluate soil-herbicide-plant relationships (Jeffries & Gannon, 2016;Loux, 1990;Sandín-España et al, 2011;Strebig & Kudsk, 1993).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select herbicide treatment concentrations, the average herbicide carryover concentration at the time of soybean planting was first calculated using linear regression equations describing the first-order rate of degradation of atrazine, mesosulfuronmethyl, and topramezone in the same soil types established in a previous study (Ramanathan et al, 2022). The equations described in Ramanathan et al (2022) relate the initial concentration of each herbicide to the concentration remaining after degradation over time at a specific degradation rate unique to each soil type. Therefore, respective equations for atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone degradation in Candor sand, Creedmoor sandy loam, and Portsmouth sandy loam were used to calculate the average carryover concentration remaining at the time of soybean planting across soils, assuming the initial herbicide concentration to be the maximum application rate applied to previous season corn (atrazine and topramezone) or winter wheat (mesosulfuron-methyl) and estimating 335, 90, and 212 days between atrazine, mesosulfuron-methyl, and topramezone application, and soybean planting in the region, respectively (USDA-NASS, 2022).…”
Section: Herbicide Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported field half‐life range for topramezone is between 11 and 69 days (Lewis et al., 2016; Shaner, 2014c). Previous research shows that atrazine half‐life ranged from 37 to 73 days and topramezone half‐life ranged from 15 to 19 days in regionally relevant NC soil types, and their persistence was found to be dependent on soil OM content, clay content, and pH, while mesosulfuron‐methyl persistence was also influenced by soil temperature (Ramanathan et al., 2022). Collectively, half‐life ranges of these herbicides suggest that they can persist in soil and become available for uptake by rotational crops long after their application, depending on edaphic factors and environmental conditions (Frank, 1966; Rahman et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Quantification of atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone persistence in regional soil types allows the estimation of average carryover residue concentration that may be present at the time of soybean planting in NC (Ramanathan et al., 2022). Characterizing the bioavailability of atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone will provide needed insight regarding differences among representative regional soils in their potential for carryover herbicide injury depending on the influence of their properties on the availability of carryover herbicide concentration for plant uptake.…”
Herbicide carryover injury to rotational crops can vary in severity depending on the influence of soil properties on herbicide bioavailability. Greenhouse bioassays were conducted with soybean, radish, and canola to evaluate differences in the bioavailability of three herbicides with carryover risk, atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone. Bioassays were conducted in three varying regional soil types with nine herbicide treatment rates including a control. Plant visual injury was evaluated weekly, and aboveground dry biomass was weighed after harvest of soybean 28 days after emergence (DAE) and radish and canola 21 DAE. A log‐logistic dose–response regression model was used to quantify herbicide‐effective concentrations for 30% (EC30), 50% (EC50), and 80% (EC80) visual injury and aboveground dry biomass reduction in each soil type. Relative herbicide‐soil bioavailability was determined through comparisons of herbicide‐effective concentrations among soil types. Pearson correlation revealed that atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone EC30 for all species were positively correlated to soil organic matter (OM) content (r = 0.56, 0.48, and 0.40, respectively) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) (r = 0.43, 0.41, and 0.45). Topramezone EC80 for soybean and radish was positively correlated to soil clay content (r = 0.51) and silt content (r = 0.51) and negatively correlated to sand content (r = −0.51) and pH (r = −0.52). Decreased atrazine, mesosulfuron‐methyl, and topramezone bioavailability in soil with high OM and CEC, decreased topramezone bioavailability in coarse‐textured soil and at high soil pH, and differential herbicide sensitivity of crop species can inform grower decisions on herbicide selections and rotational crop plans.
The residue of atrazine in field soils poses a major threat to crop growth in the rotation system, raising concerns about grain security and food safety. Current agricultural production requires more efficient and cost-effective mitigation measures in response to the emerging threat. This study reported the critical concentration (0.1 mg L−1) of atrazine injury to soybean seedlings in soil pore water and how biochar amendment could influence the distribution of atrazine in different soil environments. The results showed that biochar significantly reduced the concentration of atrazine in soil pore water, for example, 0.5% biochar in red (cinnamon, fluvo-aquic, paddy, black) soil reduced atrazine concentration from 0.31 (0.20, 0.18, 0.12, 0.03) mg L−1 to 0.004 (0.002, 0.005, 0.013, 0.011) mg L−1 in pore water (P < 0.01). On the basis of these, a reliable mathematical model was developed to predict the atrazine concentration in soil pore water under (or without) biochar amendment conditions. The verification results showed that the mean absolute percentage error of the model was 14.1%, indicating that the prediction error was within a reasonable range. Our work provides a precise solution to crop injury caused by soil residual herbicides with the aid of biochar, which reduces the bioavailability of atrazine in soybean seedlings. This method not only maximizes the use of biochar but also provides effective crop protection and environmental benefits.
Graphical Abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.