2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0515-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

aTRAM - automated target restricted assembly method: a fast method for assembling loci across divergent taxa from next-generation sequencing data

Abstract: BackgroundAssembling genes from next-generation sequencing data is not only time consuming but computationally difficult, particularly for taxa without a closely related reference genome. Assembling even a draft genome using de novo approaches can take days, even on a powerful computer, and these assemblies typically require data from a variety of genomic libraries. Here we describe software that will alleviate these issues by rapidly assembling genes from distantly related taxa using a single library of paire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These settings include trimming reads with lengths <40 (MINLEN:40), bases at the start of a read with quality scores <5 (LEADING:5), bases at the end of a read with scores <15 (TRAILING:15) and bases in a sliding window where four consecutive bases have an average quality <15 (SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15). We then used the automated Target Restricted Assembly Method, atram 2.0 (Allen et al, ; http://www.github.com/juliema/aTRAM) to assemble haemosporidian parasite genes using the 498 reference Haemoproteus gene sequences. This approach uses local blast searches and an iterative approach to produce assemblies for genes of interest from cleaned read data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These settings include trimming reads with lengths <40 (MINLEN:40), bases at the start of a read with quality scores <5 (LEADING:5), bases at the end of a read with scores <15 (TRAILING:15) and bases in a sliding window where four consecutive bases have an average quality <15 (SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15). We then used the automated Target Restricted Assembly Method, atram 2.0 (Allen et al, ; http://www.github.com/juliema/aTRAM) to assemble haemosporidian parasite genes using the 498 reference Haemoproteus gene sequences. This approach uses local blast searches and an iterative approach to produce assemblies for genes of interest from cleaned read data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also describe our bioinformatics pipeline using atram 2.0 (Allen, Huang, Cronk, & Johnson, 2015;Allen, LaFrance, Folk, Johnson, & Guralnick, 2018) for locus assembly and phyluce (Faircloth, 2015) and custom PERL and Python scripts for downstream processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used aTRAM (Allen et al. ) to assemble exons for the Physconelloides emersoni library sequenced at a higher depth. Of the three higher coverage libraries, this sample had the highest predicted depth after quality control (Sample 1, Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain orthologous sequences for downstream analysis, we developed a novel approach to assemble and map the cleaned genomic data. First, we used aTRAM (Allen et al 2015) to assemble exons for the Physconelloides emersoni library sequenced at a higher depth. Of the three higher coverage libraries, this sample had the highest predicted depth after quality control (Sample 1, Table S1).…”
Section: Data Assembly and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy Browser organizes DNA sequences from multiple databases into a taxonomy tree, covering about 10% of all known eukaryotic species (Acland et al 2014). If the species of interest has not been covered in NCBI, then gene identification and annotation can be done using next-generation sequencing and sequence alignment software (Allen et al 2015). These bioinformatics tools are invaluable in developing novel models of morphogenesis and developmental toxicity.…”
Section: Comparative Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%