Proceedings the Seventh IEEE European Test Workshop
DOI: 10.1109/etw.2002.1029635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATPG for timing-induced functional errors on trigger events in hardware-software systems

Abstract: We consider timing-induced functional errors in inter process communication. We present an A utomatic Test Pattern Generation (ATPG) algorithm for the co-validation of hardware-software systems. Events on trigger signals ( signals contained in the sensitivity list of a process) implement the basic synchronization mechanism in most hardware-software description languages. Timing faults on trigger signals can have a serious impact on system behavior. We target timing faults on trigger signals by enhancing a timi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this challenge, we can deploy different verification technologies in a single methodology. Methodologies applying Formal Methods to identify faults that cannot propagate to outputs of the design (Safe faults) [4][5] [6], and ATPG techniques to generate test patterns that potentialize fault propagation [7] [8] have been proposed. Even though Simulation, Formal Methods and ATPG have complementary strengths, to the best of our knowledge, they were not previously combined in a single fault analysis flow that aims at fault propagation for compliance to ISO26262 requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this challenge, we can deploy different verification technologies in a single methodology. Methodologies applying Formal Methods to identify faults that cannot propagate to outputs of the design (Safe faults) [4][5] [6], and ATPG techniques to generate test patterns that potentialize fault propagation [7] [8] have been proposed. Even though Simulation, Formal Methods and ATPG have complementary strengths, to the best of our knowledge, they were not previously combined in a single fault analysis flow that aims at fault propagation for compliance to ISO26262 requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATPG tools are able to create test patterns that potentialize fault propagation. Simulation can be performed with the generated test vectors aiming to achieve better failure coverage with reduced simulation times [8] [9]. Nonetheless, ATPG focuses on manufacturing test and is not optimal for determining untestable faults or covering faults on areas out of the scan chains reach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%