1999
DOI: 10.1002/jlb.66.5.723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATP receptors and giant cell formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the mononuclear cells appeared to form cell aggregates indicating that they were following a pathway of activity leading to fusion, but were unable to carry out this final step when higher concentrations of P2X7R antagonists were present. This is consistent with a report describing how P2X7Rs preferentially localise to sites of cell-to-cell contact [32] and a previous observation that the formation of cell aggregates in culture was a prerequisite to cell fusion [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, the mononuclear cells appeared to form cell aggregates indicating that they were following a pathway of activity leading to fusion, but were unable to carry out this final step when higher concentrations of P2X7R antagonists were present. This is consistent with a report describing how P2X7Rs preferentially localise to sites of cell-to-cell contact [32] and a previous observation that the formation of cell aggregates in culture was a prerequisite to cell fusion [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, it has been demonstrated that macrophage cell clones expressing high levels of P2X7R spontaneously fuse in vitro, whereas clones lacking the P2X7R do not. Furthermore, multinucleated giant cell formation from macrophage fusion could be blocked with a monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the P2X7R [7]. These data strongly implicate P2X7R-induced pore formation in the development of multinucleated giant cells and, more specifically, in their fusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…When these parameters were plotted as a function of the agonist concentration, they were well fit by standard sigmoidal dose-response equations (Fig. 1, C and D); half-maximal EC 50 values for time-to-onset and percent total cells blebbed were 33 Ϯ 2 M and 72 Ϯ 3 M, respectively. These values are within the range of EC 50 values (3-40 M) for membrane current, dye uptake or calcium entry in these cells under identical conditions (10,28,30) and thus indicate that the signaling pathway(s) underlying these rapid morphological changes are engaged over the same range as that for activation of the P2X 7 ion channel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Results from the present study show that this is not the case for brief receptor activation. Whereas the physiological role(s) for the rapid, reversible actin filament rearrangements and subsequent zeosis induced by PS flip in response to brief P2X 7 receptor activation are not known, previous studies have linked activation of this receptor to cell proliferation in human lymphocytes and to cell-cell fusion in other immune cells (8,9,50,51), both processes of which require concerted cytoskeletal reorganization and regulated plasma membrane disruption. The pseudoapoptosis identified in the present study may provide a mechanism underlying P2X 7 R-generated giant cell formation at sites of inflammation or cell proliferation during tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also the only P2 receptor subtype known to be strongly antagonized by oATP (11). Because oATP treatment attenuates multiple functions of monocytes and macrophages, autocrine activation of the P2X7 nucleotide receptor has been implicated in the fusion of monocytes into multinucleate giant cells (48) and in various sequellae of endotoxin activation, such as the release of arachidonic acid, NO, and IL-1␤ (5-7, 9, 20). However, oATP was originally developed as an affinity label for ATP-binding enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%