Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, PPi or AMP-PNP needs to act on this presumed, barely visible closed state at an extremely fast rate; otherwise, this closed event will become more discernible in the single-channel recording. As the chemical structure of AMP-PNP is nearly identical to that of ATP (Yount, 1975), and this ATP analogue can be found comfortably nestled in the ATP-binding sites of ABC transporters (Dawson and Locher, 2007), one comes to an ineluctable implication that ATP can also readily reopen the channel from state X. Thus, contrary to the long-held idea that ATP opens CFTR solely through the long interburst closure, one has to conclude that some of the short-lived closures that are buried in an opening burst can respond to ATP to enter the open state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, PPi or AMP-PNP needs to act on this presumed, barely visible closed state at an extremely fast rate; otherwise, this closed event will become more discernible in the single-channel recording. As the chemical structure of AMP-PNP is nearly identical to that of ATP (Yount, 1975), and this ATP analogue can be found comfortably nestled in the ATP-binding sites of ABC transporters (Dawson and Locher, 2007), one comes to an ineluctable implication that ATP can also readily reopen the channel from state X. Thus, contrary to the long-held idea that ATP opens CFTR solely through the long interburst closure, one has to conclude that some of the short-lived closures that are buried in an opening burst can respond to ATP to enter the open state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although p[NH]ppA and ATPγS are frequently employed as non‐hydrolysable analogues of ATP, the precise structures of the three nucleotides do differ. For example, p[NH]ppA has distinct bond lengths (P–N = 1.7 Å compared to P–O = 1.6 Å) and bond angles (P–N–P = 127° compared to P–O–P = 130°), as well as a lower p K a for the terminal phosphate compared to ATP [53]. These stereochemical differences could manifest as non‐identical effects of ATP compared to p[NH]ppA, as has been seen in the F1‐ATPase, where a 100‐fold difference in apparent affinity for ATP and p[NH]ppA binding has been described [54,55].…”
Section: Atp Binding Provides the Initial Impetus For Translocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinases can use ATPγS to thiophosphorylate proteins, making them resistant to rapid dephosphorylation. ATPγS can be hydrolyzed by some enzymes but usually at a much lower rate compared with ATP (Yount 1975). Addition of ATPγS to in vitro splicing reactions was initially reported to stall splicing during the second catalytic step (Tazi et al 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%