1995
DOI: 10.1615/atomizspr.v5.i45.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomization of Cross-Injecting Sprays Into Convective Air Stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be verified that, independent of the injection configuration, of the liquid flow rate and of the gas velocity, the size of the droplets measured experimentally were greater in the shorter axial distance (x = 0.12 m). The decrease in size with the axial distance x was also reported by Kihm et al [20]. Measurements taken downstream from the point of liquid injection, at x = 0.18 and 0.24 m, show D 32 to be close in size, suggesting that, once generated, the droplet size tends to stabilize quickly as it flows.…”
Section: Variation Of the Droplet Diameter With L/gsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be verified that, independent of the injection configuration, of the liquid flow rate and of the gas velocity, the size of the droplets measured experimentally were greater in the shorter axial distance (x = 0.12 m). The decrease in size with the axial distance x was also reported by Kihm et al [20]. Measurements taken downstream from the point of liquid injection, at x = 0.18 and 0.24 m, show D 32 to be close in size, suggesting that, once generated, the droplet size tends to stabilize quickly as it flows.…”
Section: Variation Of the Droplet Diameter With L/gsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…10 and 11 present the experimental data for Sauter mean diameter, D 32 , as a function of L/G for different operational conditions. It can be noticed that, in all cases, the droplet size tended [20] and Wu et al [21] observed similar behavior when studying the size of droplets originating from a jet of water injected transversally to an air stream. Here, however, in some cases (e.g.…”
Section: Variation Of the Droplet Diameter With L/gmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deviations in fit were attributed to differ- This approach was then applied in order to determine the physical processes responsible for determining the resultant jet and emulsion jet in crossflow droplet size distribution within the plume cross section. The current grouping presents a new set of nondimensional numbers which is different from past studies (Kihm et al, 1995) and is favorable for its use of the momentum flux ratio q and simple form. A new multiphase nondimensional number was defined, the multiphase Bond number (Mu = Bo e /Bo l−g ), to balance the body-to-surface force balance for the current three-fluid component problem in order to quantitatively capture the influence the discrete emulsion droplets have on breakup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kihm et al provided a physical-empirical formulation for the determination of the jet in crossflow droplet size within the spray plume for pure liquids using the Buckingham π approach (Kihm et al, 1995). In the present work, this approach was adapted to incorporate the additional factors associated with emulsions while retaining the application to pure fuels.…”
Section: Atomization and Spraysmentioning
confidence: 99%