2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic-mesoscale interfacial resistance based thermal analysis of carbon nanotube systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A monotonic decay of the temperature, which follows an exponential order, is observed in these simulations. The interfacial thermal resistance value is estimated for single-walled nanotube embedded in LDPE as 5:05 Â 10 À8 m 2 K=W (Unnikrishnan et al 2008a(Unnikrishnan et al , 2009). The effect of the defects in single-walled nanotubes is found to decrease the interfacial thermal resistance values to 3.85 Â 10 À8 m 2 K/W and 4.42 Â 10 À8 m 2 K/W for one and two defects, respectively (Unnikrishnan et al 2008a(Unnikrishnan et al , 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A monotonic decay of the temperature, which follows an exponential order, is observed in these simulations. The interfacial thermal resistance value is estimated for single-walled nanotube embedded in LDPE as 5:05 Â 10 À8 m 2 K=W (Unnikrishnan et al 2008a(Unnikrishnan et al , 2009). The effect of the defects in single-walled nanotubes is found to decrease the interfacial thermal resistance values to 3.85 Â 10 À8 m 2 K/W and 4.42 Â 10 À8 m 2 K/W for one and two defects, respectively (Unnikrishnan et al 2008a(Unnikrishnan et al , 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.3 Cooling profiles of pristine single-walled nanotube in LDPE thermal conductivity, and the size of the nanoparticle (Unnikrishnan et al 2008a(Unnikrishnan et al , 2009. It should be noted that, because of the interfacial boundary resistance, there exists a strong anisotropy in the thermal behavior of the nanomaterials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, even though carbon nanotube has higher thermal conductivity than silicon, higher levels of enhancement of pool boiling heat flux (especially critical heat flux) was observed for heaters with silicon nanofins. 31 Subsequently, Singh et al 33 , Unnikrishnan et al 42 , and Singh 43 , and showed that the Kapitza Resistance ("R k ") for carbon nanotubes at the interface with the working fluid is ~1000 times higher than that for the silicon nanofin structures. 33,42,43 Therefore, Kapitza Resistance was identified as the dominant parameter for determining the level of heat flux enhancement for the nanocoatings.…”
Section: 32837mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Subsequently, Singh et al 33 , Unnikrishnan et al 42 , and Singh 43 , and showed that the Kapitza Resistance ("R k ") for carbon nanotubes at the interface with the working fluid is ~1000 times higher than that for the silicon nanofin structures. 33,42,43 Therefore, Kapitza Resistance was identified as the dominant parameter for determining the level of heat flux enhancement for the nanocoatings. Hence, it is not surprising that the silicon nanofins yield higher values of critical heat flux than carbon nanotubes, despite the fact that carbon has a higher thermal conductivity than silicon.…”
Section: 32837mentioning
confidence: 99%