2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-018-0729-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic investigation of the T-stress effect on fracture toughness of copper and aluminum single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10,41] Also, it is within the range of expected "upper" and "lower" limit of K IC , that is, 1.08 MPa√m and 0.767 MPa√m, of which the first is evaluated by using density functional theory analyses including lattice trapping, while the second is the theoretical value provided by Griffith's criterion. [45] Going back to the results of Figure 5, the normalized K If are plotted against the length of the singular stress field from FE analyses Λ K . It should be recalled that FE analyses are conducted based on the failure conditions obtained from MS analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10,41] Also, it is within the range of expected "upper" and "lower" limit of K IC , that is, 1.08 MPa√m and 0.767 MPa√m, of which the first is evaluated by using density functional theory analyses including lattice trapping, while the second is the theoretical value provided by Griffith's criterion. [45] Going back to the results of Figure 5, the normalized K If are plotted against the length of the singular stress field from FE analyses Λ K . It should be recalled that FE analyses are conducted based on the failure conditions obtained from MS analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of clarity, it should be mentioned that the FE analyses give slightly larger stresses. A hypothesis is that employment, eventually, of two‐parameters model or inclusion of the T‐stress would correct the differences . Going back to the results of Figure , the normalized K If are plotted against the length of the singular stress field from FE analyses Λ K .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, at a very small scale, the simplification of a body as continuum and homogeneous may not hold, and the discrete nature of atoms should be considered [6][7][8]. Clarification of these aspects could not only bring enormous development in the field of nanotechnology, but macroscale could benefit as well, e.g., multi-scale modeling of fatigue with focus on short cracks and interaction with local micro-structure [9,10], atomistic investigation of stresses, strains and grain boundaries [11], fracture properties of advanced materials [12,13], experimental evaluation of fatigue curve of microscale samples [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some publications are focused on the estimation of the fracture properties of single crystal Cu by similar approaches. Lee et al [18] used the interatomic potential function of the embedded-atom method to model face-centered cubic structures and to analyze the mode-I fracture behavior under various magnitudes of T-stress. The fractal theory is adopted to interpolate the surface roughness and morphology influence between the Cu rigid plane and elasto-plastic rough substrate [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%