2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic investigation of the impact of phosphorus impurities on the tungsten grain boundary decohesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All simulations were performed using LAMMPS [37]. The interatomic interactions were modelled through a MEAM potential which was specifically fit to study GB fracture in W with P segregation [20,22]. Tungsten is largely an ideal model material as due to its elastic isotropy, the crack tip stress field remains well-defined, also in the presence of a GB.…”
Section: Atomistic Simulations Of Grain Boundary Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All simulations were performed using LAMMPS [37]. The interatomic interactions were modelled through a MEAM potential which was specifically fit to study GB fracture in W with P segregation [20,22]. Tungsten is largely an ideal model material as due to its elastic isotropy, the crack tip stress field remains well-defined, also in the presence of a GB.…”
Section: Atomistic Simulations Of Grain Boundary Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great efforts have been made in the last decades to study the role of various impurity elements on the embrittling effects of segregated solutes at GBs through chemical investigation of bulkscale specimen fracture surfaces [16]. More recently, first-principle calculations of the segregation energy and the work of separation on individual, symmetric low đť›´ GBs [17][18][19][20] confirmed that P at the GBs reduces the GB cohesion. These calculations, however, only studied P atoms at specific GB sites at low coverage, not allowing for direct P-P interactions, and were not addressing more general GBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%