2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2020.106844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic calculations of the generalized stacking fault energies in two refractory multi-principal element alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will severely increase the computational cost if the target is to investigate γ usf for a large amount of alloying compositions, for example, 106 compositions in the present work. On the other hand, due to the mirror symmetry of the (1 10) plane, γ usf of the (1 10) [111] slip in a bcc lattice should occur at a shift distance of | 1 4 [111]| although deviations may be induced by the local chemical variations and lattice distortions [62]. In the present work, for the sake of simplification, we used the GSF energies that correspond to the | 1 4 [111]| shifts on different fault planes in the supercell to derive the averaged γ usf for a given alloy composition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will severely increase the computational cost if the target is to investigate γ usf for a large amount of alloying compositions, for example, 106 compositions in the present work. On the other hand, due to the mirror symmetry of the (1 10) plane, γ usf of the (1 10) [111] slip in a bcc lattice should occur at a shift distance of | 1 4 [111]| although deviations may be induced by the local chemical variations and lattice distortions [62]. In the present work, for the sake of simplification, we used the GSF energies that correspond to the | 1 4 [111]| shifts on different fault planes in the supercell to derive the averaged γ usf for a given alloy composition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrinsic γ sf e of alloys can vary over a large range of 150mJ/m 2 [40]. Earlier reports did not consider the chemistry of the shearing interface which influences the γ usf e of the overall alloy [12,20,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Unstable Stacking-fault Energy (γ Usf E )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special quasirandom structures (SQS) have been extensively used to predict the SFE of alloys due to their simplicity in capturing the inherent chemical disorder present in the alloys [67]. There have been numerous reports on SFE of concentrated alloys calculated using SQS, albeit without any consideration to the shearing interface chemistry [12,20,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. There has been significant deviations in the literature about the reported γ usf e values even for the pure metals [9,16].…”
Section: Shearing Interface Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then need to repeat the calculations for different random configurations in order to obtain the average SFE of the random alloy. The "magic" minimum number, i.e., the number mostly reported in other works [36,11], of required configurations is 28 when the atom types are distributed using the SQS method (cf., e.g., [36,11]). Additionally assuming that we are interested in the average SFE at 5-10 different compositions of the random alloy, we already require more than 10 000 DFT calculations corresponding to two months of absolute computing time.…”
Section: A Few Remarks On Computing the Sfe With Dftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of common supercell boundary conditions are discussed in the following (see, e.g., [6,36,11]. One possibility is to apply periodic boundary conditions to the supercells containing {r i } bulk and {r i } sf .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%