2003
DOI: 10.1038/nmat918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomistic basis for the plastic yield criterion of metallic glass

Abstract: Because of their disordered atomic structure, amorphous metals (termed metallic glasses) have fundamentally different deformation mechanisms compared with polycrystalline metals. These different mechanisms give metallic glasses high strength, but the extent to which they affect other macroscopic deformation properties is uncertain. For example, the nature of the plastic-yield criterion is a point of contention, with some studies reporting yield behaviour roughly in line with that of polycrystalline metals, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

22
266
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
22
266
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been well documented that the inherent shearand-dilatation coupling in STZs leads to the pressure (or normal stress) sensitivity of macroscopic failure (flow and fracture) of metallic glasses [20,21]. Two direct pieces of evidence of such pressure sensitivity are that fracture angles under either compression or tension always deviate from the maximum shear stress plane (45°) [22][23][24]; and shear stresses at yielding depend on the applied hydrostatic pressure or normal stress [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that the inherent shearand-dilatation coupling in STZs leads to the pressure (or normal stress) sensitivity of macroscopic failure (flow and fracture) of metallic glasses [20,21]. Two direct pieces of evidence of such pressure sensitivity are that fracture angles under either compression or tension always deviate from the maximum shear stress plane (45°) [22][23][24]; and shear stresses at yielding depend on the applied hydrostatic pressure or normal stress [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these models are based on the local structural rearrangement of atoms via the interplay of atomic-scale shear and dilation/contraction in MGs [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Among them, Argon's STZ model involves local rearrangement of a cluster of atoms undergoing a stress-driven, and thermally activated shear distortion [25,23,24]. Whereas Spaepen's free volume model is based on a dynamic equilibrium between the stress-assisted creation and annihilation of free volume [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the shear response of amorphous solids has received a significant amount of attention in the theoretical physics and molecular simulation literature over the past decade [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], significantly less attention has been devoted to hydrostatic loading in such systems [9,10]. This omission appears significant since experimental studies in metallic glass (MG) and other amorphous solids reveal nanocavities [11,12] that form during or subsequent to deformation and strongly implicate cavitation in the physics of the fracture process zone, even when the fracture behavior is relatively brittle [13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%