2019
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201903137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomically Dispersed Mo Supported on Metallic Co9S8 Nanoflakes as an Advanced Noble‐Metal‐Free Bifunctional Water Splitting Catalyst Working in Universal pH Conditions

Abstract: sunlight for sustainable energy conversion and storage. [1] For renewable and efficient hydrogen production, electrochemical water splitting employing renewable electrical energy is a promising route due to its inherent advantages, including readily available reactant, stable output, and feasibility of large-scale production. [2] However, the large overpotential (η) of both hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) greatly limited their practical applications. Moreover, due to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
111
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As displayed in Figure a, a low cell voltage of only 1.46 V was required for the electrolyzer to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm –2 which is superior to Pt/C/FF||RuO 2 /FF with 1.52 V (Figure S15, Supporting Information). The electrolyzer composed of FFNaRu and FFNaNi presented electrocatalytic performances comparable to previous materials, such as a‐RuTe 2 PNR, [ 11d ] NiFeRu‐LDH, [ 20 ] Mo‐Co 9 S 8 @C, [ 21 ] Pt‐CoS 2 /CC, [ 22 ] CoFeZr oxides/NF, [ 2a ] Ir/MoS 2 /CF, [ 23 ] Ru NP/C+NiFe LDH, [ 24 ] RuCu NSs/C, [ 25 ] and CoFe‐CDs+CoFeRu@C [ 26 ] (Figure 6b) and other reported nanomaterials (Table S3, Supporting Information). Moreover, the long‐term stability at a current density of 10 mA cm –2 showed negligible current loss after 12 h, demonstrating its superior overall water‐splitting durability (Figure 6c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As displayed in Figure a, a low cell voltage of only 1.46 V was required for the electrolyzer to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm –2 which is superior to Pt/C/FF||RuO 2 /FF with 1.52 V (Figure S15, Supporting Information). The electrolyzer composed of FFNaRu and FFNaNi presented electrocatalytic performances comparable to previous materials, such as a‐RuTe 2 PNR, [ 11d ] NiFeRu‐LDH, [ 20 ] Mo‐Co 9 S 8 @C, [ 21 ] Pt‐CoS 2 /CC, [ 22 ] CoFeZr oxides/NF, [ 2a ] Ir/MoS 2 /CF, [ 23 ] Ru NP/C+NiFe LDH, [ 24 ] RuCu NSs/C, [ 25 ] and CoFe‐CDs+CoFeRu@C [ 26 ] (Figure 6b) and other reported nanomaterials (Table S3, Supporting Information). Moreover, the long‐term stability at a current density of 10 mA cm –2 showed negligible current loss after 12 h, demonstrating its superior overall water‐splitting durability (Figure 6c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In principle, the difference in the adsorption energies between ΔG O* and ΔG OH* is suggested to be a descriptor for estimating the catalytic capability for OER. [52] Ru-SA/Ti 3 C 2 T x exhibits a lower ΔG O* −ΔG OH* value Figure 7. DFT calculation results.…”
Section: Theoretical Insights Into the Structure-activity Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun and co-workers also found the possible Mo and Co dual-sites mechanism, as the Mo-enhanced Co synergistic active sites are more competitive than the single Mo and Co sites (Figure 2d,e). [54] With the aid of surface X-ray scattering technique at welldefined catalyst surface, Shao-Horn and co-workers have experimentally identified the reaction pathways of OER at RuO 2 in acid, and proposed a modified mechanism, which is different from the traditional AEM (Figure 2f). [55] The RuO 2 exposes two different Ru sites, i.e., a coordinatively unsaturated site (CUS) bound with five O atoms and a bridge site (BRI) coordinated with six O atoms.…”
Section: Modified Reaction Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%