1978
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/11/2/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic sulphur lines from above the first ionisation limit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Gibson et al also noted that radiative transitions from the 3d term could influence the intensity ratio if radiative decay is more important for 3d than for 4d. In fact Alder et al (1978) have observed emission lines from the term identified as 3d and Joshi et a1 who measured the total absorption, instead of the autoionization yield, give the 3d absorption as being somewhat stronger than the 4d absorption. This is in agreement both with the present calculation and with that due to Froese Fischer (1987).…”
Section: Wementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, Gibson et al also noted that radiative transitions from the 3d term could influence the intensity ratio if radiative decay is more important for 3d than for 4d. In fact Alder et al (1978) have observed emission lines from the term identified as 3d and Joshi et a1 who measured the total absorption, instead of the autoionization yield, give the 3d absorption as being somewhat stronger than the 4d absorption. This is in agreement both with the present calculation and with that due to Froese Fischer (1987).…”
Section: Wementioning
confidence: 97%