2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic structure and migration dynamics of MoS2/LixMoS2 interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to an increasing projected reaction area during the phase boundary motion, the K ion diffusivity in CF x is estimated to be 2.2–2.5 × 10 –12 cm 2 s –1 , in Figure 3a and Table S1 in the Supporting Information, based on the equation D = d 2 /t , where D is ion diffusivity, d 2 is the projection area, and t is the diffusion time. [ 18 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an increasing projected reaction area during the phase boundary motion, the K ion diffusivity in CF x is estimated to be 2.2–2.5 × 10 –12 cm 2 s –1 , in Figure 3a and Table S1 in the Supporting Information, based on the equation D = d 2 /t , where D is ion diffusivity, d 2 is the projection area, and t is the diffusion time. [ 18 ]…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to an increasing projected reaction area during the phase boundary motion, the K ion diffusivity in CF x is estimated to be ~232.9 nm 2 /s in Figure 2d, based on the equation D = d 2 /t, where D is ion diffusivity, d 2 is the projection area, and t is the diffusion time. 28 Sodiation of the CF x sample exhibits a similar two-phase response, as shown in Figure 2b, 3d-f, S4 and S6i-p, and Movie S3, S5. Observing the TEM and HAADF-STEM images, we conclude that the volume of CF x remains unchanged after sodiation (Figure 2e), and the SAED pattern ( Figure 3e) shows a two-phase reaction representing the transformation of CF x to NaF and C, which is in agreement with previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Na + insertion induced the start of a two‐phase reaction, in which trigonal prismatic 2H MoS 2 gradually transformed into octahedral 1T‐NaMoS 2 . A boundary with 2 nm thickness was observed and propagated at ≈3–7 nm s −1 , which was much slower than that of lithiation (∼30–70 nm s −1 ) reported in previous studies (Figure ) . The Na + transport induced a large number of crystal defects in MoS 2 , which was accompanied by the fracture of the continuous layered structure into few nanosized domains (Figure e, f).…”
Section: Charge Storage In Sibs and Kibsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the preparation of ultrathin MoS 2 nanosheets might be an effective strategy to suppress the strain and improve the cycling stability of electrode materials. The atomic structure and dynamics of the reaction interface between the lithiated Li x MoS 2 and pristine MoS 2 have been investigated intensively using in situ TEM . The reaction interface was composed of a pristine 2H phase, a 1T phase, and a distorted 1T phase noted as 1T′ phase.…”
Section: Charge Storage In Libsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation