2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2920100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic-SDN: Is Synchronous Flooding the Solution to Software-Defined Networking in IoT?

Abstract: The adoption of Software Defined Networking (SDN) within traditional networks has provided operators the ability to manage diverse resources and easily reconfigure networks as requirements change. Recent research has extended this concept to IEEE 802.15.4 low-power wireless networks, which form a key component of the Internet of Things (IoT). However, the multiple traffic patterns necessary for SDN control makes it difficult to apply this approach to these highly challenging environments. This paper presents A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of standardized top layers reduces the flexibility of the software-defined network. Atomic SDN [ 31 ] transmits the signaling traffic in a more efficient, fast, and isolated way from the other processes, using synchronous flooding mechanisms but due to the different types of flows it becomes complex, since it needs an algorithm for each type. A lot of research in SD-WSN has been focused on routing optimization and data flow control, but other aspects such as topology control can be improved, as it has been done in [ 32 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of standardized top layers reduces the flexibility of the software-defined network. Atomic SDN [ 31 ] transmits the signaling traffic in a more efficient, fast, and isolated way from the other processes, using synchronous flooding mechanisms but due to the different types of flows it becomes complex, since it needs an algorithm for each type. A lot of research in SD-WSN has been focused on routing optimization and data flow control, but other aspects such as topology control can be improved, as it has been done in [ 32 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other SDN architectures can be found in state of the art. In [53], authors introduce a new architecture for low-power wireless networks in SDN. This synchronous flooding (SF) architecture dynamically sets up SF protocols to provide reliable and low-latency performance when complex SDN control requirements are needed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient heuristic named the congestion-aware local fast reroute (CALFR) was then designed. Baddeley et al (2019) have presented Atomic-SDN, a highly reliable and low-latency solution for SDN in low-power wireless. Atomic-SDN introduces a novel synchronous flooding (SF) architecture capable of dynamically configuring SF protocols to satisfy complex SDN control requirements.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%