2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2013.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic scale mixing for inertial confinement fusion associated hydro instabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous work addressed convergence issues for probability density functions (PDF) and their indefinite integrals, the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) [21,22] with experimental validation in [20,23,24], relative to the hot-cold water splitter experiments [16]. We have also considered two-point statistical descriptions of RT and RM mixtures [25][26][27].…”
Section: A Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous work addressed convergence issues for probability density functions (PDF) and their indefinite integrals, the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) [21,22] with experimental validation in [20,23,24], relative to the hot-cold water splitter experiments [16]. We have also considered two-point statistical descriptions of RT and RM mixtures [25][26][27].…”
Section: A Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also agrees with the spectra reported by previous papers. 24,25 However, it is clear from the noise in these figures that the current sample size (64 slices) does not give sufficient statistics at the low wavenumber end of the spectrum to make conclusive statements about the exact slope of the inverse spectrum. Even in recent DNS of homogeneous 2D turbulence, a resolution of 16 000þ points in each direction has been required to clearly see both cascades in stationary turbulence, hence it would be somewhat optimistic to expect a clear result here.…”
Section: E Turbulent Kinetic Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Two recent papers focussing on turbulent transport and mesh convergence in 2D RM in cylindrical geometry highlight the different physics expected in 2D inhomogeneous mixing. 24,25 The assumption that the two-dimensional problem is simpler and easier to run than the 3D case at first appears quite clear. However, the physics of two-dimensional turbulence is dramatically different from it's 3D counterpart, as is very well summarised in the review by Kraichnan and Montgomery 26 and more recently by Boffetta and Ecke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for turbulence modeling, the analogous resolution of ambiguity requires specifying the turbulent transport, exactly the quantity which introduces the ambiguity. Nonuniqueness of apparently converged LES is observed in practice and is an issue that solution verification methodology has yet to address [29].…”
Section: Examples Of Nonuniqueness For Equations Of Evolution Mathemmentioning
confidence: 99%