2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-019-0671-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic-scale fragmentation and collapse of antiferromagnetic order in a doped Mott insulator

Abstract: Disentangling the relationship between the insulating state with a charge gap and the magnetic order in an antiferromagnetic (AF) Mott insulator remains difficult due to inherent phase separation as the Mott state is perturbed. Measuring magnetic and electronic properties at the atomic length scales would provide crucial insight, but this is yet to be experimentally achieved. Here we use spectroscopic-imaging spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy (SP-STM) to visualize periodic spin-resolved modulations … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(73 reference statements)
6
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, C and D), spectral gapmaps look virtually identical (Fig. 4, G and H), thus confirming that short-range AF order is not the cause behind the spatially inhomogeneous gap closing (16). While our work points toward La 2 substitutions in the middle SrO layer having the strongest correlation with the regions where the AF order is absent, it remains to be seen what is the physical effect driving this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4, C and D), spectral gapmaps look virtually identical (Fig. 4, G and H), thus confirming that short-range AF order is not the cause behind the spatially inhomogeneous gap closing (16). While our work points toward La 2 substitutions in the middle SrO layer having the strongest correlation with the regions where the AF order is absent, it remains to be seen what is the physical effect driving this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Inset in (F) is a 2D intensity cross-correlation histogram of | M 1 ( r , 5 K)| and | M 2 ( r , 5 K)|. ( G and H ) Maps of the spectral gap Δ( r ) [section S3 and ( 16 , 34 , 35 )] at 9 and 5 K, respectively, both obtained over the same area as | M ( r , T )| maps. STM setup condition: M ( r ) maps: V sample = 600 mV, I set = 100 pA, ±4 T, 5 K (A), 7 K (B), 9 K (C), and 5 K (D); Δ( r ) maps: V sample = 300 mV, I set = 200 pA, V exc = 6 mV, 0 T, 9 K (G) and 5 K (H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations