2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(2000)77:2<516::aid-qua2>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic orbital basis sets for use with effective core potentials

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Basis sets developed for use with effective core potentials describe pseudo-orbitals rather than orbitals. The primitive Gaussian functions and the contraction coefficients in the basis set must therefore both describe the valence region effectively and allow the pseudo-orbital to be small in the core region. The latter is particularly difficult using 1s primitive functions, which have their maxima at the nucleus. Several methods of choosing contraction coefficients are tried, and it is found that nat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional s function was also uncontracted for the PP-based sets as single uncontracted primitive functions recover less correlation energy when using PPs than in the all-electron case. 37,39,40 This was also tested for p functions, but the incremental correlation energy lowering was small and extra uncontracted p primitives were not included in the current case. The resulting total correlating functions uncontracted from the HF primitives for the PP based sets were (2s1p1d), (3s2p2d), (4s3p3d), and (5s4p4d) for DZ-5Z, respectively.…”
Section: B Correlating Functions-valence Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional s function was also uncontracted for the PP-based sets as single uncontracted primitive functions recover less correlation energy when using PPs than in the all-electron case. 37,39,40 This was also tested for p functions, but the incremental correlation energy lowering was small and extra uncontracted p primitives were not included in the current case. The resulting total correlating functions uncontracted from the HF primitives for the PP based sets were (2s1p1d), (3s2p2d), (4s3p3d), and (5s4p4d) for DZ-5Z, respectively.…”
Section: B Correlating Functions-valence Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus s 1 p 3 5 S appears in the intershell table as p 3 ( 4 S)s 1 ( 2 S) 5 1. λ N Oλ 1 S states with seniority 0. These are usually the highest-energy states from this electron configuration.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Programmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(continued on next page) 10 G −8 g 9 ( 10 S) s 1 ( 2 S) 11 S −9 g 9 ( 10 S) s 1 ( 2 S) 9 S 11 J 212 K 211 K 213 2 or 14 d, p electrons 3 5 . The present calculation was used to obtain the s, p, and d contractions together.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compact correlation-consistent double zeta plus polarization basis sets developed for use with RECPs, and SO operators were employed. 130 Large reference spaces consisting of the fully occupied 1u, 2u, 3u MOs and the partially occupied 1u, 1u, 3u…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%