“…Since the advent of graphene, two-dimensional (2D) materials have been extensively explored due to their outstanding mechanical and electronic properties that hold great promise for device applications. − In particular, for 2D elemental structures, such as borophene, silicene, germanene, and stanene, both theoretical and experimental studies − have revealed the critical role of substrate in the epitaxial growth, as they usually require a metallic substrate as catalyst with appropriate lattice match, except for a few cases of van der Waals epitaxy on inert substrates. , Unfortunately, the strong interfacial interaction between substrate and the grown structure results in difficulty in transferring of the structure onto a device-ready surface, which restricts practical applications. − An attractive yet challenging way is to synthesize 2D materials directly on a nonmetallic substrate, such as semiconductors or insulators. − As a recent example, via a delicately designed precursor with a C–F motif at the right position, Kolmer et al rationally fabricated nanographene and nanoribbons on a rutile TiO 2 (001) . However, the design and synthesis of these molecular precursors are daunting challenges. − In this sense, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on an appropriate substrate has the benefit of sole usage of their bulk crystalline counterparts as precursors, such as graphite rods, silicon and germanium wafers, tin, boron rods, phosphorus (P) crystals, and antimony and bismuth granules. , During the past decade, MBE has also become one of the most popular approaches for large-scale synthesis of 2D materials.…”