The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-019-1172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Friction: Anisotropy and Asymmetry Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The COM trajectory shows that the tip does not move directly along the direction of pulling but instead meanders across the surface, as previously reported for previous AFM experiments. [38][39][40] This behavior can be attributed to the spring compliance both along the axis of sliding and the axis perpendicular to sliding, which enables the tip to follow a lower energy path. In addition, high frequency fluctuations in response to both thermal noise and the varying tip-sample forces occur due to the dynamic responses of these springs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COM trajectory shows that the tip does not move directly along the direction of pulling but instead meanders across the surface, as previously reported for previous AFM experiments. [38][39][40] This behavior can be attributed to the spring compliance both along the axis of sliding and the axis perpendicular to sliding, which enables the tip to follow a lower energy path. In addition, high frequency fluctuations in response to both thermal noise and the varying tip-sample forces occur due to the dynamic responses of these springs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring friction anisotropy requires the ability to either rotate the sample with respect to the cantilever scanning direction (see Figure S1a) via a specially designed stage as done, e.g., in Ref. 20, or a method to calibrate forces and pull the AFM tip along different scanning directions as done, e.g., in Ref. 21 (see Figure S1b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent theoretical and experimental studies 20,47,48 suggest that the interaction potential at the contact interface affects the configuration of anisotropic frictional forces. Therefore, if the potential energy landscape exhibits anisotropy, this could directly explain the observed friction trends.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above, the presence of the solvent appears to affect the effective contact stiffness through the applied load (in addition to the known impact of the load on the amplitude of the interaction energy). We chose to focus on data that were collected at room temperature, at a single constant scanning velocity, such that the amplitude of the corrugation interaction potential and the effective stiffness can be affected by effects of symmetry and dimensionality [13,[25][26][27][30][31][32][33] through the applied normal load [26,33,42,43]. Consequently, the 1D interpretation of 2D motion of the tip, or some deviation from the symmetry of the sine periodic interaction energy ascribed by the PT model, can potentially influence the behaviors of U 0 and K eff .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a scan, the tip bends and releases with respect to its position along the atomic-scale periodicity of the sample (for ordered surfaces), and produces a stick-slip pattern in the lateral force signal. Studies on nanoscale friction have shown that several properties influence this dynamics, such as contact area [4][5][6][7][8][9], sliding velocity [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], temperature [11,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23], anisotropy, symmetry and dimensionality [13,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and the applied normal load [4,5,23,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%