2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(03)00584-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscopy studies of lateral phase separation in mixed monolayers of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine and dilauroylphosphatidylcholine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 mN·m -1 , very close to the pure saturated MGDG, therefore this argument can be used to elucidate the expulsion of one of the components in a mixed film. Maintaining temperature and external pressure constant, the number of degrees of freedom F of the monolayer system is given by the equation (6) [28,49,50]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 mN·m -1 , very close to the pure saturated MGDG, therefore this argument can be used to elucidate the expulsion of one of the components in a mixed film. Maintaining temperature and external pressure constant, the number of degrees of freedom F of the monolayer system is given by the equation (6) [28,49,50]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DG exc was reported to be approximately À600, À1200, À1900, and 1000 J mol À1 at X additive = 0.3 and p % 30 mN m À1 for DPPC/cholesterol, DPPC/dipalmitoylphosphatic acid (DPPA), DPPC/dihexadecylphosphate (DHPS), and DPPC/dilauroylphosphatidylcholine (DLPC) monolayers, respectively. [24,[35][36][37] The small values of DG exc for the DPPC/C 60 system connote that the attractive interaction between the two components is very weak, but the miscibility increases with increasing surface pressure, probably due to enhanced many-body interactions at high film densities. [11][12][13] Atomic force microscopy images have clearly shown the DPPC monolayers in different phases (LE and LC; see Figure S2 of the Supporting Information) which were transferred to freshly cleaved mica surfaces at defined surface pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No horizontal plateau was observed in any of the isotherms but a kink, or a change in slope, could be detected for the (25:75) mixture. The collapse pressures which varied between 50 and 62 mN m −1 were relatively constant, possibly indicating a low miscibility (Sanchez and Badia, 2003).…”
Section: Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 97%