2022
DOI: 10.3791/64497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During indentation, the resulting forces may damage the cantilever and/or the sample or the tip [29][30][31]. Therefore, it is considered necessary to resort to the proposed method to avoid this problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During indentation, the resulting forces may damage the cantilever and/or the sample or the tip [29][30][31]. Therefore, it is considered necessary to resort to the proposed method to avoid this problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elastic modulus measurements were obtained by AFM cantilever-based nanoindentation. 29,30 Epitaxial graphene (Figure S4) showed the highest average stiffness (69.4 GPa), followed by CVD graphene (12.6 GPa), and printed graphene, which had the lowest value (11.5 GPa) for stiffness. All values obtained are considerably lower than the associated substrates and the theoretical Young's modulus of graphene, suggesting that the measured values are primarily influenced by the graphene scaffold fabrication method and/or layer number.…”
Section: Graphene Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the mechanical measurement, RTESP-300 probes were used: tip radius = 8 nm, spring constant = 40 N/m. Tips were calibrated on a sapphire test sample in a similar way than in Enrriques et al, study [31].…”
Section: Scanning Probe Microscopy Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%