2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Cournotian traders may be Walrasian

Abstract: In a bilateral oligopoly, with large traders, represented as atoms, and small traders, represented by an atomless part, when is there a non-empty intersection between the sets of Walras and Cournot-Nash allocations? Using a two-commodity version of the Shapley window model, we show that a necessary and sufficient condition for a Cournot-Nash allocation to be a Walras allocation is that all atoms demand a null amount of one of the two commodities. We provide four examples which show that this characterization h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose thatx 1 (t) = 0 orx 2 (t) = 0, for each t ∈ T 1 . Then, the pair (p,x) is a Walras equilibrium, by Theorem 4 in Codognato et al (2015). But then, x is Pareto optimal, by Theorem 2.…”
Section: Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Suppose thatx 1 (t) = 0 orx 2 (t) = 0, for each t ∈ T 1 . Then, the pair (p,x) is a Walras equilibrium, by Theorem 4 in Codognato et al (2015). But then, x is Pareto optimal, by Theorem 2.…”
Section: Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This result establishes a relationship among the Cournotian tradition of oligopoly, the Walrasian tradition of perfect competition, and the Paretian analysis of optimality. Some examples computed by Codognato et al (2015) provide evidence that this characterization holds non-vacuously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations