2022
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202200399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic and Electronic Structures of the Interfaces between Perovskite La0.75Sr0.25MnO3 and Brownmillerite SrCoO2.5

Abstract: Epitaxial thin films composed of perovskite and brownmillerite oxides have received increasing attention because of the novel phenomena found in these systems. Herein, the atomic and electronic structures of the La0.75Sr0.25MnO3/SrCoO2.5 interface have been studied using first‐principles calculations. From the perspective of polarity compensation, three types of possible interface models are constructed, which have different interface terminations or orientation relationship. In the model where the [100] direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BM and P phases of LSCO have different band gaps, and charge transfer might occur at the interface; in addition, P is a nonpolar solid while BM can be switched from a nonpolar to a polar solid by rotation of the tetrahedral chains , and thus a polar discontinuity could occur as well; finally, P and BM crystals have a significant lattice ,, and symmetry mismatch, , which could allow for spin and orbital reconstructions at the interface. Although several studies have identified structural distortions and anisotropic magnetic properties at the BM/P interfaces formed between different TMOs, , the occurrence of an MIT at the interface has not yet been investigated, and in general BM/P interfaces formed within the same TMO solid (e.g., La–Sr–Co–O system) are poorly studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BM and P phases of LSCO have different band gaps, and charge transfer might occur at the interface; in addition, P is a nonpolar solid while BM can be switched from a nonpolar to a polar solid by rotation of the tetrahedral chains , and thus a polar discontinuity could occur as well; finally, P and BM crystals have a significant lattice ,, and symmetry mismatch, , which could allow for spin and orbital reconstructions at the interface. Although several studies have identified structural distortions and anisotropic magnetic properties at the BM/P interfaces formed between different TMOs, , the occurrence of an MIT at the interface has not yet been investigated, and in general BM/P interfaces formed within the same TMO solid (e.g., La–Sr–Co–O system) are poorly studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%