2019
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning

Abstract: We present ATOMIC, an atlas of everyday commonsense reasoning, organized through 877k textual descriptions of inferential knowledge. Compared to existing resources that center around taxonomic knowledge, ATOMIC focuses on inferential knowledge organized as typed if-then relations with variables (e.g., "if X pays Y a compliment, then Y will likely return the compliment"). We propose nine if-then relation types to distinguish causes vs. effects, agents vs. themes, voluntary vs. involuntary events, and actions vs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
470
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(494 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
470
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We query a suite of knowledge bases (Concept-Net (Speer and Havasi, 2013), WebChild (Tandon et al, 2017), ATOMIC (Sap et al, 2019)) to create knowledge graph embeddings. First, we examine all relationships, indexing each unique relationship sequentially.…”
Section: Knowledge Graph Querymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We query a suite of knowledge bases (Concept-Net (Speer and Havasi, 2013), WebChild (Tandon et al, 2017), ATOMIC (Sap et al, 2019)) to create knowledge graph embeddings. First, we examine all relationships, indexing each unique relationship sequentially.…”
Section: Knowledge Graph Querymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to model "entities" as natural language phrases and relations as any concept that can link them (Li et al, 2016;Sap et al, 2019). OpenIE approaches display this property of open text entities and relations Mausam et al, 2012), but being extractive, they only capture knowledge that is explicitly mentioned in text, limiting their applicability for capturing commonsense knowledge, which is often implicit (Gordon and Van Durme, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge for incorporating intents into event embeddings is that we should have a largescale labeled dataset, which annotated the event and its actor's intents. Recently, Rashkin et al (2018) and Sap et al (2019) released such valuable commonsense knowledge dataset (ATOMIC), which consists of 25,000 event phrases covering a diverse range of daily-life events and situations. For example, given an event "PersonX drinks coffee in the morning", the dataset labels PersonX's likely intent is "PersonX wants to stay awake".…”
Section: Intent Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, intent and sentiment can be used to learn more fine-grained semantic features for event embeddings. Such commonsense knowledge is not explicitly expressed but can be found in a knowledge base such as Event2Mind (Rashkin et al, 2018) and ATOMIC (Sap et al, 2019). Thus, we aim to incorporate the external commonsense knowledge, i.e., intent and sentiment, into the learning process to generate better event representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%