2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic Absorption Spectrometry and Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of Concentration of Calcium Ions and Smear Layer Removal With Root Canal Chelators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
31

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(63 reference statements)
5
78
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…For the effective removal of organic and inorganic components from the smear layer, irrigation with EDTA combined with different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) has been recommended (4). However, the search for solutions more biocompatible than EDTA, in an attempt to minimize damage to the periapical tissues, has appeared with increasing frequency in the literature (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the effective removal of organic and inorganic components from the smear layer, irrigation with EDTA combined with different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) has been recommended (4). However, the search for solutions more biocompatible than EDTA, in an attempt to minimize damage to the periapical tissues, has appeared with increasing frequency in the literature (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sen et al (7) observed erosion of the root dentin after using EDTA in concentrations of 1, 5, 10 and 15% for 1 min. Another disadvantage is that EDTA is considered a pollutant, since this substance is not found originally in nature (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spano et al [17] showed using atomic absorption spectrophotometry that apple vinegar removed amounts of calcium ions from the root canal similar to 5% malic acid, and 5% acetic acid. These solutions were less effective than 10% citric acid and the EDTA resulted in the greatest concentration of calcium ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the chelating agents in the removal of the smear layer, demineralization and reduction of microhardness can be analyzed through various methods such as Atomic absorption spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy [17], digital optical microscopy [18] and microhardness tests [8][9][10]. The microhardness test is widely used to classify materials and compare changes in their properties, being a simple, effective and well defined The efficacy of a chelating agent is dependent on the time for which it remains in the root canal, since the solution does not act immediately when placed in contact with the dentin, requiring some minutes to obtain a chelating effect [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compensate for possible limitations in the root canal treatment resulting from the obstacles faced during preparation, a 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was used, with a greater concentration of active chlorine when compared with the concentration of 1% (2). Calcium hydroxide dressing was used to enhance disinfection of dentinal tubules (16,17). During root canal filling, it was necessary to customize a longer-than-usual master gutta-percha point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%