2011 34th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2011.6043763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric turbulences in Free Space Optics channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model adopting (8) and (11) is valid for a point-to-point communication, as stated in (Dordova & Wilfert, 2009;Al Naboulsi et al, 2005), whereas in our case, with a receiver physical extension (point-to-receiver), a better approximation is provided by (Vitasek et al, 2011). In the latter, turbulence effect computation considers the diameter of receiver optical lens (i.e., effective receiver area): on the basis of mathematical analysis of turbulence in atmosphere presented by Larry and Andrews (Andrews, 2004), in the case of point-toreceiver photon path, by defining the receiver lens diameter as DR, Eq.…”
Section: Atmospheric Turbulencementioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model adopting (8) and (11) is valid for a point-to-point communication, as stated in (Dordova & Wilfert, 2009;Al Naboulsi et al, 2005), whereas in our case, with a receiver physical extension (point-to-receiver), a better approximation is provided by (Vitasek et al, 2011). In the latter, turbulence effect computation considers the diameter of receiver optical lens (i.e., effective receiver area): on the basis of mathematical analysis of turbulence in atmosphere presented by Larry and Andrews (Andrews, 2004), in the case of point-toreceiver photon path, by defining the receiver lens diameter as DR, Eq.…”
Section: Atmospheric Turbulencementioning
confidence: 79%
“…K62, K01, AlN04a, and AlN04r models utilized for comparison with simulated data can be found in (Mori & Marzano, 2015) and reference therein where k = 2π/⋋ is wave number and C 2 n is the index of refraction structure parameter, measured in [m −2/3 ]. The latter can be estimated through semi-empirical formulas moving from the knowledge of atmospheric factors like temperature, pressure, and humidity (Cherubini & Businger, 2013;d'Auria et al, 1993): it usually ranges from 10 −17 m −2/3 for weak turbulence to 10 −12 m −2/3 for a strong one (Vitasek et al, 2011). The linear attenuation corresponding to (8) is:…”
Section: Atmospheric Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aperture averaging is the most valuable asset of Andrews's method. Due to this fact the turbulence attenuation is lower in comparison with other method [6,7,8,9]. The turbulence attenuation in dB is given by the relation.…”
Section: A Andrews's Methods and Rytov's Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of station is used for communication at distance of 300 m and for data transmission rate of 4x2048 Mbps. The typical Bit Error Rate (BER) of atmospheric optical link is corresponding to the 10 -9 value and receiving optical head is using photodetector based on silica (Si) [9].…”
Section: Communication Stationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total attenuation is a combination of atmospheric attenuation and geometric losses. In the FSO link two known weather phenomena are scattering and turbulence which causes attenuation in the transmitted signal those results in high bit error rate or signal loss at the receiver end [4,5].…”
Section: Iintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%