1963
DOI: 10.1080/00028896309342926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Sulfur Dioxide and Particulate Matter A Comparison of Methods of Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than using a single absorption coefficient as a basis for comparison, it was decided to use two, encompassing the range indicated by Stalker et al 6 . It should be mentioned that the "Nashville-Thomas Autometer" curve which they included was purposely excluded in the selection of absorption coefficients for the present comparison, since that particular curve was known to have a large error resulting from gases other than sulfur dioxide.…”
Section: Sulfation and Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than using a single absorption coefficient as a basis for comparison, it was decided to use two, encompassing the range indicated by Stalker et al 6 . It should be mentioned that the "Nashville-Thomas Autometer" curve which they included was purposely excluded in the selection of absorption coefficients for the present comparison, since that particular curve was known to have a large error resulting from gases other than sulfur dioxide.…”
Section: Sulfation and Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The procedure consists of drawing air through a pre-weighed filter at a known flow rate for a measured time interval. The mass concentration of the particulates collected is equal to the accumulated weightdivided by the air volume sampled; this is usually expressed in units of micrograms per cubic meter (/xg/m 3 ). This measurement is complicated by the need to change the niters periodically and to weigh them before and after use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%