1999
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.102.629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Three-Flavor Neutrinos. II

Abstract: We analyze the atmospheric neutrino experiments of SuperKamiokande (535 days) using the three-flavor neutrino framework with the mass hierarchy m_1 nearly equal m_2 << m_3. We study the event ratios of sub-GeV, multi-GeV and upward through-going muons zenith angle distributions. Taking into account the atmospheric and terrestrial experiments, we obtain the allowed regions of mass and mixing parameters \Delta m_{12}^2, sin^22\theta_{12}, \Delta m_{23}^2, \theta_{13} and \theta_{23}. The mass parameter \Delta m^… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next discuss the sub-leading effects due to ∆m 2 21 oscillations for vanishing small value of θ 13 [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139]. In this approximation and for constant Earth matter density the relevant oscillation probabilities can be written as:…”
Section: Effects Due To ∆M 2 21 In Atmospheric Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next discuss the sub-leading effects due to ∆m 2 21 oscillations for vanishing small value of θ 13 [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139]. In this approximation and for constant Earth matter density the relevant oscillation probabilities can be written as:…”
Section: Effects Due To ∆M 2 21 In Atmospheric Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus one should analyze the experimental data not in the oversimplified two family but in a three family mixing scheme. This has been done by several authors [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The results of these analyses are displayed in table I and II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%