Current Topics in Public Health 2013
DOI: 10.5772/54775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Nanoparticles and Their Impacts on Public Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Little is known about the interaction of aerosol particles with and within clouds and is highlighted as a major research uncertainty by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [ Solomon et al, ; Stocker et al , ]. The health implications of aerosols are also important due to growing evidence of the adverse health effects that nanoparticle air pollution causes [ Slezakova et al , ]. As a notable example, the World Health Organization (WHO) named airborne particulate matter and, specifically, nanoparticles, a major cause of premature infant mortality [ WHO, , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Little is known about the interaction of aerosol particles with and within clouds and is highlighted as a major research uncertainty by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [ Solomon et al, ; Stocker et al , ]. The health implications of aerosols are also important due to growing evidence of the adverse health effects that nanoparticle air pollution causes [ Slezakova et al , ]. As a notable example, the World Health Organization (WHO) named airborne particulate matter and, specifically, nanoparticles, a major cause of premature infant mortality [ WHO, , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is neither an atmospheric global model to explicitly include nanoparticles as relevant ice nucleating particles, nor does the IPCC consider them in major comparative modeling studies. However, of note is that nanoparticles are considered in human health impacts by both the IPCC and the WHO [ Slezakova et al , ]. On another front, experimental challenges have so far precluded researchers from evaluating various hypotheses regarding the role of nanosized materials in snow formation [ Welti et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supercoarse particles (>10,000 nm diameter) do not enter the respiratory system. The coarse particles (diameter 2500-10,000 nm), represented by pollen, spores, sea salt aerosols, or by the particles generated through wind erosion, deposit on the ground within few hours after their production but can also enter the upper airways of the human respiratory tract, from where they can be eliminated back into the atmosphere by coughing, or they can be ingested by swallowing [10]. The fine particles (100-2500 nm diameter) produced naturally (through nuclei-mode particles coagulation or through vapour molecules condensation on particles surfaces) but mostly through anthropogenic processes (vehicles or industry emissions) [11], can enter the respiratory tract till the alveoli level.…”
Section: Atmospheric Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike fine or coarse PM particles, there is no effective monitoring or regulation of nanoparticles. The main anthropogenic sources of these particles are from vehicles and industrial emissions, including coal combustion products [157]. Besides carbonaceous matter, both CFA and diesel emissions contain nanosized metal oxide particles as free particles and also as attached to other particles including soot [158].…”
Section: Studies Show That Iron Oxide (Fe 2 O 3 )mentioning
confidence: 99%