2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000jd000196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric longwave irradiance uncertainty: Pyrgeometers compared to an absolute sky‐scanning radiometer, atmospheric emitted radiance interferometer, and radiative transfer model calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
4
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hatzianastassiou et al (2005), based on their global satellite-derived surface radiation product validated against GEBA data, provided additional evidence for a lower downward shortwave radiation than commonly assumed, in line with the findings of the GEBA-based global energy balance studies mentioned above. A detailed assessment of their radiation scheme compared to GEBA data over the Mediterranean area was performed by Papadimas et al (2012) and Pyrina et al (2015). Hatzianastassiou et al (2012) further noted that the trends in their surface shortwave radiation product are in reasonable agreement with the GEBA records.…”
Section: Validation Of Surface Energy Fluxes From Climate Models Reamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hatzianastassiou et al (2005), based on their global satellite-derived surface radiation product validated against GEBA data, provided additional evidence for a lower downward shortwave radiation than commonly assumed, in line with the findings of the GEBA-based global energy balance studies mentioned above. A detailed assessment of their radiation scheme compared to GEBA data over the Mediterranean area was performed by Papadimas et al (2012) and Pyrina et al (2015). Hatzianastassiou et al (2012) further noted that the trends in their surface shortwave radiation product are in reasonable agreement with the GEBA records.…”
Section: Validation Of Surface Energy Fluxes From Climate Models Reamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Diffuse shortwave radiation measurements are obtained by shading the pyranometers from the direct solar beam, with an instantaneous accuracy of 2-4 W m −2 under ideal conditions (Michalsky et al, 2007). The instantaneous accuracy of downward longwave radiation measurements carried out with pyrgeometers is near 3-4 W m −2 under ideal conditions (Philipona et al, 2001;Marty et al, 2003;Wang and Dickinson, 2013b). No assessments of the accuracy of the nonradiative fluxes on monthly timescales as stored in GEBA are available.…”
Section: Content and Data Sources Of Gebamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the uncertainty of groundbased longwave radiation measurements will affect the T sfc and H estimates. The sensitivity of T sfc and H to measurement uncertainties is tested by artificially adding 1%, 2%, and 4% error to the longwave radiation during the daytime (0900-1800 local time), which corresponds to measurements with low, medium, and high uncertainty according Philipona et al (2001) and Kohsiek et al (2007). The monsoon period (1-30 September 2009) is taken as an example for the sensitivity test and the three error levels results in a T sfc uncertainty of 0.29, 0.59, and 1.18 K during the daytime, respectively.…”
Section: A Ground Surface Temperature Uncertainty and Its Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pyrgeometer performance is quantified by the absolute calibration accuracy, measurement stability, angular response, dome spectral transmissivity, direct solar heating and dome temperature effects (e.g., Philipona et al, 1995Philipona et al, , 2001Wendisch and Brenguier, 2013;Gröbner et al, 2014). For a modified Eppley Precision Infrared Radiometer (PIR), Philipona et al (2001) quantified daytime and nighttime precision with 0.4 % (±1 W m −2 ) at night and 1 % (±2 W m −2 ) at day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%