2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Erosion by Giant Impacts onto Terrestrial Planets

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the third suite of different-density bodies, we take as a base a fast, grazing scenario (b=0.7, v c =3 v esc ) with the 10 0 M ⊕ target and --10 1, 0.5,0 M ⊕ impactors. These collisions yield middling erosion and tend to align closely with previous scaling laws ( Kegerreis et al 2020). For each of these default planets, we create new versions that are made entirely of iron or entirely of rock (instead of the default 30:70 mass ratio) keeping the same masses and allowing the radii to change, or keeping the same radii and allowing the masses to change, as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Appendix a Initial Conditions And Impact Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the third suite of different-density bodies, we take as a base a fast, grazing scenario (b=0.7, v c =3 v esc ) with the 10 0 M ⊕ target and --10 1, 0.5,0 M ⊕ impactors. These collisions yield middling erosion and tend to align closely with previous scaling laws ( Kegerreis et al 2020). For each of these default planets, we create new versions that are made entirely of iron or entirely of rock (instead of the default 30:70 mass ratio) keeping the same masses and allowing the radii to change, or keeping the same radii and allowing the masses to change, as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Appendix a Initial Conditions And Impact Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For the variable bulk densities in this study, we make the minor change to a fractional interacting mass, f M (b), as detailed in Appendix B, though this modification makes little quantitative are set ignoring the atmosphere and neglecting any tidal distortion before the collision. The initial separation is set such that the time to impact under the same assumptions is 1 hr, using the equations in Appendix A of Kegerreis et al (2020). 6 The WoMa code for producing spherical and spinning planetary profiles and initial conditions is publicly available with documentation and examples at github.com/srbonilla/WoMa, and the python module woma can be installed directly with pip (Ruiz-Bonilla et al 2020).…”
Section: Erosion Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not known whether Venus lost its water gradually over time through warming or through episodic impacts (e.g., Ahrens, 1993;Kegerreis et al, 2020). However, it is important to learn the history of water on Venus because it contextualizes the potential timeline of the origin of life, and the divergent evolution of the two most similar planets in our solar system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these techniques are not enough to solve some computation-intensive problems and grand challenge problems. For example, recently the impact of a planetary collision is revealed by the simulation, and this simulation is carried out by a COSmology MAchine (COSMA) supercomputer to have the simulation result in a reasonable time [2]. Definitely, a rational researcher could not expect a simulation will take a couple of months or even years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%