2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2019.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric dry and bulk nitrogen deposition to forest environment in the North China Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deposition velocities used in this study for TN, ON, and NO 3 – was 1.2 cm s –1 and for NH 4 + was 0.6 cm s –1 . These V d for particulate NO 3 – and NH 4 + were much closer to the one used by Fu et al for forest ecosystems in China. Similar deposition velocity for NO 3 – was also applied by Chen and Huang to calculate the deposition flux over the South China Sea.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deposition velocities used in this study for TN, ON, and NO 3 – was 1.2 cm s –1 and for NH 4 + was 0.6 cm s –1 . These V d for particulate NO 3 – and NH 4 + were much closer to the one used by Fu et al for forest ecosystems in China. Similar deposition velocity for NO 3 – was also applied by Chen and Huang to calculate the deposition flux over the South China Sea.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…+ were much closer to the one used by Fu et al 39 for forest ecosystems in China. Similar deposition velocity for NO 3 − was also applied by Chen and Huang 40 to calculate the deposition flux over the South China Sea.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Ambient NO 2 is mainly attributed to industrial sources (e.g., fossil fuel burning; automobile exhausts; power plants), and so is highest in the most populated areas [33,34]. Although some research has shown that NO 2 exhibits seasonal variation [29,35] because of fossil fuel burning in winter, there were no NO 2 pollution sources near our site other than the state road (#318), and so NO 2 concentrations showed little seasonal variation. + dominated bulk Nr deposition in forest ecosystems in China, with a mean bulk deposition of 9.4 kg N ha −1 y −1 for NH 4 + -N and 3.9 kg N ha −1 y −1 for NO 3 − -N [36].…”
Section: Variation Of Monthly Bulk Nr Concentrations and Atmospheric ...mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Dry deposition was calculated as the atmospheric Nr concentration multiplied by the deposition velocity. Monthly atmospheric Nr concentrations were obtained from the measured NH 3 and NO 2 concentrations and deposition velocities in forests from Flechard et al [10]; these have been widely used to estimate Nr deposition in forest environments [29,30]. Deposition velocities of NH 3 and NO 2 were 1.6 cm s −1 and 0.16 cm s −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Calculations and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, although no fertilizers were used in the CK treatment, nitrogen leaching of 34.91 kg•ha −1 occurred, which we presumed was due to: (i) nitrogen fertilizer remaining from previous crops, since residual nitrate can move continuously downwards and be lost even if it is not leached during the season of application [11]; (ii) nitrogen deposition, for example, a 3-year study investigated atmospheric deposition of different nitrogen species at 10 sites in Northern China and the results indicated that nitrogen deposition levels in Northern China were high, with an average of 59.8 kg•N•ha −1 •yr −1 [31].…”
Section: Effect Of Fertilization Strategies On Nitrogen Leachingmentioning
confidence: 99%