2018
DOI: 10.3390/atmos9040137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Distribution of PAHs and Quinones in the Gas and PM1 Phases in the Guadalajara Metropolitan Area, Mexico: Sources and Health Risk

Abstract: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and quinones in the gas phase and as submicron particles raise concerns due to their potentially carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. The majority of existing studies have investigated the formation of quinones, but it is also important to consider both the primary and secondary sources to estimate their contributions. The objectives of this study were to characterize PAHs and quinones in the gas and particulate matter (PM 1 ) phases in order to identify phase distribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was the most abundant quinone in the gas phase (9.0 ± 4.8 ng m −3 ), followed by the 1,4-AQ (7.4 ± 2.0 ng m −3 ), whereas the 1,4-AQ predominated (4.0 ± 0.90 ng m −3 ) in PM 1 . The concentrations found under this sampling scheme are between 2.5 and 4.5 times higher than those previously reported (2015) at TLA using sampling periods of 24 h [44]. These measurements can be explained by the decrease in positive and negative sampling artefacts.…”
Section: Ambient Levels and Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was the most abundant quinone in the gas phase (9.0 ± 4.8 ng m −3 ), followed by the 1,4-AQ (7.4 ± 2.0 ng m −3 ), whereas the 1,4-AQ predominated (4.0 ± 0.90 ng m −3 ) in PM 1 . The concentrations found under this sampling scheme are between 2.5 and 4.5 times higher than those previously reported (2015) at TLA using sampling periods of 24 h [44]. These measurements can be explained by the decrease in positive and negative sampling artefacts.…”
Section: Ambient Levels and Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The results of our previous study [44] carried out in April-June 2015 during sampling periods of 24 h in TLA obtained an average of Σ 16 PAH in the gas phase of 137 ± 37.7 ng m −3 and Σ 16 PAH in PM 1 of 7.25 ± 8.34 ng m −3 . Comparing each 4 h period in this study was 1.7 to 3.17 times higher in the gas phase and 0.74 to 1.63 times higher in PM 1 .…”
Section: Ambient Levels and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Ojeda-Castillo et al [32] carried out a simultaneous sampling of gas phase and PM 1 for the 16 priority PAHs and 8 quinones during the warm dry season of 2015 in the Centro and Tlaquepaque, being the first time that this particle size is measured in conjunction with the organic gas phase in the GMA. The levels of Σ 16 PAHs (sum of gas phase and PM 1 ) were found in the range of 69.34-209.77 ng m −3 .…”
Section: Organic Components As Emission Indicators (Polycyclic Aromatmentioning
confidence: 99%