2018
DOI: 10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2018.57.4.2105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric corrections of the cosmic ray fluxes detected by the Solar Neutron Telescope at the Summit of the Sierra Negra Volcano in Mexico

Abstract: Un Telescopio de Neutrones Solares (TNS) fue instalado en la cima del volcán Sierra Negra, Pue., México (19.0º N , 97.3º W, 4580 m sobre el nivel del mar); el cual se encuentra en operación desde el 2004. En este trabajo, utilizamos los valores de la presión barométrica, de la presión dinámica, de la temperatura ambiental y de la humedad relativa obtenidos por una estación meteorológica cercana al TNS, para calcular los coeficientes de corrección atmosféricos para el flujo registrado de rayos cósmicos. Cuando … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are several other factors, other than rigidity or real effects from FDs that could influence the variations in the count rate of NM stations. Atmospheric depth, pressure, temperature, relative humidity, local wind speed, the rotation of the Earth concerning the acceptance cone of the detectors, latitudinal effects, instrumental variations, a station's sensitivity to CR modulation, equatorial anisotropy, North-South anisotropy, geomagnetic variations, snow, limited cone of acceptance, spurious modulation, magnetospheric effects or imperfections in the present results are some of the agents that might be responsible for the larger FD magnitudes measured at stations of low cutoff rigidity (see Barrantes et al 2018;Belov et al 2018, for example).…”
Section: Figsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, there are several other factors, other than rigidity or real effects from FDs that could influence the variations in the count rate of NM stations. Atmospheric depth, pressure, temperature, relative humidity, local wind speed, the rotation of the Earth concerning the acceptance cone of the detectors, latitudinal effects, instrumental variations, a station's sensitivity to CR modulation, equatorial anisotropy, North-South anisotropy, geomagnetic variations, snow, limited cone of acceptance, spurious modulation, magnetospheric effects or imperfections in the present results are some of the agents that might be responsible for the larger FD magnitudes measured at stations of low cutoff rigidity (see Barrantes et al 2018;Belov et al 2018, for example).…”
Section: Figsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We analyzed the data registered by the SNT's N2-N4 and C2-C4 channels. The data were pressure corrected using the pressure correction coefficients calculated in [1]. Subsequently, the data were normalized to the average counting rate of four days prior to each GS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%