Treatise on Geochemistry 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.01311-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric CO2 and O2 During the Phanerozoic: Tools, Patterns, and Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 272 publications
7
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These statistical characteristics of the dataset, rather than deterioration of information quality with age, may explain the weak increase in sample CV with age. Error analysis suggests that the maximum uncertainty associated with CO 2 concentration proxies is~17-50% for foraminifera at an atmospheric CO 2 concentration of 1500 ppmv, less at lower CO 2 concentrations, and less for other proxies such as boron [40] (Figure 3, p. 255). The uncertainties in proxies of atmospheric CO 2 concentration (2σ, 96% confidence limits) are generally <200 ppmv [52] ( Figure 1, p. 380).…”
Section: Co 2 Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These statistical characteristics of the dataset, rather than deterioration of information quality with age, may explain the weak increase in sample CV with age. Error analysis suggests that the maximum uncertainty associated with CO 2 concentration proxies is~17-50% for foraminifera at an atmospheric CO 2 concentration of 1500 ppmv, less at lower CO 2 concentrations, and less for other proxies such as boron [40] (Figure 3, p. 255). The uncertainties in proxies of atmospheric CO 2 concentration (2σ, 96% confidence limits) are generally <200 ppmv [52] ( Figure 1, p. 380).…”
Section: Co 2 Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pilot studies employed the original T [38] and atmospheric CO 2 concentration [19] proxy databases. Pilot studies also included temperatures adjusted for the pH of seawater versus atmospheric CO 2 concentration across the Phanerozoic [19], temperatures projected using the carbon-cycle model GEOCARB-III versus CO 2 concentration [19], and both detrended and non-detrended temperature records computed from δ 18 O data drawn from the older proxy database [24,38] versus both the old [19] and updated [40] atmospheric CO 2 concentration databases.…”
Section: Pilot Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At developmental time scales, there are strong species-specific differences in sensitivity, including cases of apparent insensitivity (Reid et al, 2003;Tricker et al, 2005;Haworth et al, 2015), as well as nonlinearities in the response over both developmental and evolutionary time scales . This has been especially problematic in attempts to use the change in D in leaf fossils, alone, as a proxy for change in global mean c a (Royer, 2014). A detailed theoretical framework for modeling the response of D to c a has been proposed that uses principles of leaf gas-exchange optimization (Konrad et al, 2008), but this awaits broader implementation and validation.…”
Section: Stomatal Size Density and Conductance Through Deep Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remaining problem is to understand what combination of radiative forcing and climate sensitivity gave rise to these very elevated temperatures in the first place (Caballero and Huber, 2013). While early Cenozoic CO 2 concentrations are understood to have been higher than modern ones (Royer, 2014), achieving a good match with reconstructed temperatures using CO 2 alone as the warming agent requires extremely high model CO 2 levels (Lunt et al, 2012), exceeding even the rather loose constraints imposed by the CO 2 proxies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%